Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 690

1 members and 689 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,106
Posts: 2,572,115
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Threaded View

  1. #18
    BPnet Veteran satomi325's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-15-2011
    Location
    In a galaxy far,far away.
    Posts
    6,423
    Thanks
    2,429
    Thanked 3,969 Times in 2,446 Posts
    Images: 5
    They say gerbils are illegal because they have a high tolerance for different types of temperature and climate. So the government states they can "establish feral colonies" and over run the native animals very easily in the state. *COUGH*

    I know. Sounds like nonsense right? While I understand the concerns of having non-native animals, they reasoning is totally off. They have no scientific data to back this up.

    A lot of animals that have been well established and some considered domestic are illegal in this state due to the same reasons of Bio-invasion. (i.e. hedgehogs, sugar gliders, ferrets, gerbils etc etc.)

    CA has the worst government and rules ever....Let's see a hedgehog go wild and over run the state...

    Seriously, there is no record of any of the pet species on the banned list that has ever formed dangerous and harmful colonies in the US. Yet they allow cats and dogs, both species known to go feral and do actual damage. (Makes no sense to me)

    To the OP: sorry for hijacking the tread. (maybe i'll start a new thread)
    Last edited by satomi325; 03-22-2012 at 03:24 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1