The codominance myth

[OhhWatALoser]

I would call that the perfect oportunity to teach something new to that person. You would be surprised how many people like to learn something new. You wont know untill you try it.

Some people will thank you for correcting them. Other people will continue to use the wrong term because they are stubborn. I say it is better to give those people a chance to make their own choice.

Why not? You teach them the correct term and move on to what you wanted to talk about in the first place and if that person still want to talk about incomplete dominance... ermmm... maybe they are interested in the issue?

Where exactly did you see above anyone that studied biology saying it is not incomplete dominant. I don't see it. Besides if you read and understand, the definition of codominant and incomplete dominant (look above) you will agree that incomplete dominant is the correct term. I am not making it up. I am using the definition of the terms.

Did you read my response to that? Please read again, i have already explained it.

Yes, you don't understand and that is not the problem. The problem is you are making an effort NOT to understand.

But I can. Simply using the definition of codominant and incomplete dominant, I can.

I am not trying to win. I am trying to make you understand the definition of codominant and incomplete dominant. How you use the knowledge is your own choice.

No. YOU seem content to just "talk snakes". Don't presume to judge what other people want without asking their opinion.

What a peculiar way you choose to be understood, when you consistently choose to use the incorrect terminology. No, you are just stubborn. You are standing in front of the trees but refuse to see the forest.

There were grammar and spelling mistakes in your post, which I bolded and corrected. I'm sure you passed high school English so you must know how to write a simple response, yet you choose to still post it incorrectly. You must be stubborn and standing in front of trees and stuff.

Was the message still communicated without any confusion? Yes it was

You assume everything I said comes without experience of the exact situation and many other situation like it. Should we also be correcting people every time they say there no such thing as het pastel? I tired in the past. Found out it's all about how the community uses the word, not the actual definition. The flaw in your argument is you seem to think it matters what mendel called something. The logic behind the word is understood. No one is debating the definitions are correct, we are telling you welcome to how things really are.