Quote Originally Posted by jinx667 View Post
Issue with the clown part in those pairings is the offspring will be possible hets for clown. I am not well versed on clowns, so I am not sure if there is a marker for het clown like on some het pieds.
Not that I've [personally] seen or heard of.

My girls just look like snazzy normals with a lot of blushing, flames, faded heads and somewhat unusually high white sides....LOL

I got them from a breeder of Clowns and they were out of 100% het Clown clutches that produced visual Clowns and at least one of them [Leah] has produced Clowns already.

They were sold because the breeder is using the visual Clowns he produced instead, now.

So that brings up the issue of co-dominate pairings that produce normals and visual codoms.

Will the non-visual babies also be het Clowns and if so, what percentage?

I would assume "66% possible" from what I've read so far.

Would it be correct to offer them as "possible het Clowns"?

I've seen oodles of "possible het Clowns", "66% possible Het Clowns", "Possible Pastel Het Clown", etc being offered for sale.

[this is all so confusing!]....LOL

Also, would the light one [Agnes] be considered "banded" or something similar?

Her pattern is very nice and "odd", IMO but as I mentioned, I'm pretty clueless about subtle things....