Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,089

1 members and 1,088 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Argon Chamber?

  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran Ladybugzcrunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-04-2010
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 299 Times in 229 Posts

    Argon Chamber?

    I was doing my last bit of research tonight before buying a CO2 tank and building my euthanasia chamber tomorrow when I stumbled upon a disturbing article. You can read it for yourself here
    http://www.upc-online.org/nr/33005co2.htm
    but the cliff notes are that CO2 suffocation is very painful and considered inhumane. The upshot is that suffocation via nitrogen or argon is NOT painful and found to be much more humane mode of euthanasia. Since nitrogen is lighter than O2 it would be pretty hard to build an efficient chamber but argon gas is HEAVIER than O2 just like CO2 so would work in the same way as a CO2 Chamber. .8 Ar .2 CO2 is readily available as a welding mix. I am going to try this.............any thoughts?
    Nothing

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    03-28-2010
    Location
    North East Ohio
    Posts
    227
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts

    My thoughts

    I don't really know if there is a way to test how much it sucks for the animals, also the article is about chickens and hens I don't know if rat's have a different system to where they fall asleep earlier than hens or what. But if the price is the same or just a slight difference and you are able to get Argon then I say go for it. If it makes you feel even an ounce better then it's worth it IMO.

  3. #3
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7
    Just use cervical dislocation. It's easier, cheaper, safer, and less likely to result in a painful death.

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran m00kfu's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-31-2007
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 372 Times in 296 Posts
    Images: 3
    I've used both CO2 and argon to put rats down. I stopped using argon because the rats made noise while they were being gassed, which led me to believe it was less humane. When I gas them with CO2 they go quietly.

  5. #5
    BPnet Veteran Ladybugzcrunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-04-2010
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 299 Times in 229 Posts

    Re: Argon Chamber?

    Quote Originally Posted by mainbutter View Post
    Just use cervical dislocation. It's easier, cheaper, safer, and less likely to result in a painful death.
    I am euthanizing rat pups and would most likely pull their whole tail off (yuck). If it were a more advanced state rat I would say for sure.
    Nothing

  6. #6
    BPnet Veteran Ladybugzcrunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-04-2010
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 299 Times in 229 Posts

    Re: Argon Chamber?

    Quote Originally Posted by m00kfu View Post
    I've used both CO2 and argon to put rats down. I stopped using argon because the rats made noise while they were being gassed, which led me to believe it was less humane. When I gas them with CO2 they go quietly.
    You have my attention, can you elaborate a bit more on your procedures. I want to do the right thing as best as I can.
    Nothing

  7. #7
    BPnet Veteran m00kfu's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-31-2007
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 372 Times in 296 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: Argon Chamber?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ladybugzcrunch View Post
    You have my attention, can you elaborate a bit more on your procedures. I want to do the right thing as best as I can.
    I've got a large welding tank of CO2 that I use along with a regulator that lets me control the gas flow. I've pretty much got it set as low as it will go, and I let it run for 10 minutes or so. They'll gradually take slower and longer breaths until they stop.

    With the argon it looked more like hyperventilating, they would pick up speed with how fast they were gasping for breath and they would squeak with every breath until they stopped. Whether that squeak was voluntary or not I don't know.

    As far as which is a better way to go for the rat I really don't know, but the CO2 sure looked like a nicer way to go than the argon.
    Last edited by m00kfu; 03-30-2011 at 08:32 PM.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to m00kfu For This Useful Post:

    EvergladesExotics (03-30-2011)

  9. #8
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-20-2011
    Posts
    279
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 52 Times in 35 Posts
    If CO2 is done properly, the ratties will first fall asleep. Then, once they are passed out, the level of CO2 can be raised to humanely euthanize them. I would not feel comfortable at all saying that if you go full blast with the CO2 from the get go that it will be completely humane. If done correctly though, they literally just pass away in their sleep.

  10. #9
    BPnet Veteran Ladybugzcrunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-04-2010
    Posts
    1,000
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 299 Times in 229 Posts

    Re: Argon Chamber?

    Quote Originally Posted by m00kfu View Post
    I've got a large welding tank of CO2 that I use along with a regulator that lets me control the gas flow. I've pretty much got it set as low as it will go, and I let it run for 10 minutes or so. They'll gradually take slower and longer breaths until they stop.

    With the argon it looked more like hyperventilating, they would pick up speed with how fast they were gasping for breath and they would squeak with every breath until they stopped. Whether that squeak was voluntary or not I don't know.

    As far as which is a better way to go for the rat I really don't know, but the CO2 sure looked like a nicer way to go than the argon.
    Thank you for your input. Perhaps I should go with CO2.
    Nothing

  11. #10
    BPnet Senior Member
    Join Date
    03-04-2011
    Posts
    1,132
    Thanks
    465
    Thanked 427 Times in 341 Posts
    This question might have been asked and answered but I would say CO2, absolutely. This article details a scientific test that pretty much states what m00kfu said, in that the rats appear to suffer [B]more[B] when using argon gas than with CO2. The article itself is fairly dry and is written in scientific terms but it has some good information if you wanted to check it out.

    Here's the link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20819391

    Good luck, whatever you decide. Hope that helps.
    Before all else, be armed. - Niccolo Machiavelli

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1