» Site Navigation
0 members and 618 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,140
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Well I went through a few definitions and read through alot of court cases ( I'm weird and actually find them interesting lol) Well it appears the legality of using picture is pretty generous. Under the fair use law, you can use copyrighted material for various purposes, one of them is teaching. So as far as the law goes, I can go copy all the pictures I want and put them on my site. Would I ever do that, of course not. but saying I cannot use your copy written content... actually I can.
So it basically comes down to moralist stand point of it. Obviously if you give me permission and give me your picture, there no problem.
things like, what if someone owns the animal, and someone else owns the picture, the guy who owns the picture gives me permission, but they guy who owns the animal wants me to take it down, where should I stand?
Someone gives me someone else's picture, that person wants it taken down and also wants to know who gave it to me, where do I stand?
You give me permission, then want it taken down later, where do I stand?
what other scenario might cause problems?
-
-
Registered User
You could set up a little contract to check off before you submit images? Saying that the person has the rights to the image their submitting, and they give up the right to have it taken off the site without.. good cause?
Maybe something of that sort? I don't think the legality of it would be too big of an issue, but on the subject of the owner of the actual animal wanting the image taken down, I believe they have no legal right to say so. The image is not theirs, just the subject involved. I am pretty sure there is a law protecting photographers who take images from people changing their minds later and throwing a fit about said images. (I do photography, but haven't gotten into the nitty gritty of the rules.)
0.1 Albino Nelson's Milk snake
1.1 Pewter
0.1 Mojo Spider (Gaia)
0.1 Bumblebee
1.0 Lesserbee
1.1 Fire (Pele)
0.1 Axanthic VPI (Isis)
0.1 Normal
0.1 Pastel
1.0 Albino Burmese ("Bad Dog")
1.0 Wolf aka Puffball (Trapper)
1.0 Dork Boy (Roo)
-
-
Re: [Release] My Genetics Calculator
 Originally Posted by Misfit
You could set up a little contract to check off before you submit images? Saying that the person has the rights to the image their submitting, and they give up the right to have it taken off the site without.. good cause?
Maybe something of that sort? I don't think the legality of it would be too big of an issue, but on the subject of the owner of the actual animal wanting the image taken down, I believe they have no legal right to say so. The image is not theirs, just the subject involved. I am pretty sure there is a law protecting photographers who take images from people changing their minds later and throwing a fit about said images. (I do photography, but haven't gotten into the nitty gritty of the rules.)
legally they can't touch me, its more how does the community feel i should respond to these situations
-
-
BPnet Veteran
NEVER RELEASE FISH OR REPTILES OR ANY ANIMAL INTO THE WILD.
Please read the CARESHEET! to make sure you're doing the best you can for your pet.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to lance For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011)
-
Great work man, it's a pleasure to use!
Cheers,
-Matt
R.I.P. Steve, I'll miss you more than you could have ever known. I love you.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Matt K For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011)
-
Re: [Release] My Genetics Calculator
Hi,
 Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser
legally they can't touch me, its more how does the community feel i should respond to these situations
Be better than the law. 
Treat peoples pictures the way you would want any of your property treated.
On such things reputations are based. 
dr del
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dr del For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011),PitOnTheProwl (03-01-2011)
-
I would think most of the people who give you images to use would enjoy the fact that their animal was of quality to use Might even be cool to have a:
Morph-XXXXXX
Owner-YYYYYYY
Somewhere on the image link so people know who's animal they are looking at and the owner feels good about getting credit for their animal as well
-
The Following User Says Thank You to PitOnTheProwl For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011)
-
Re: [Release] My Genetics Calculator
Awesome calculator! Good job!
~Wendy~
RepStylin®
Reptile Collection: Amazon Tree Boas, Ball Pythons, Boa Constrictors, Brazilian Rainbow Boas, Carpet Pythons, Chondro, Corn Snakes, King Snakes, Milk Snakes and a Retic. Too many morphs to list anymore!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to wendhend For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011)
-
Re: [Release] My Genetics Calculator
Awesome! Looks like a lot of work went into that! You should be proud! That will help lots of people.
thanks,
Dave

1.0 Spinner
1.1 Mojaves
1.2 Pastels
1.0 Black Pastel
0.3 Normals
1.0 Anerytheristic Corn
55 gal. African Cichlids
-
The Following User Says Thank You to saber2th For This Useful Post:
OhhWatALoser (03-01-2011)
-
Re: [Release] My Genetics Calculator
 Originally Posted by dr del
Hi,
Be better than the law.
Treat peoples pictures the way you would want any of your property treated.
On such things reputations are based.
dr del
Problem is, im not most people, my pictures, I give to the whole world to use without my permission as long as its not for commercial use and they do not do anything misleading with it. no questions asked. If its in the public domain, it stays in the public domain, most people do not feel this way I have noticed.
I could see certain situations "listed above" id be walking on fine line of public domain vs person's feelings. How does the community feel I should respond to them?
 Originally Posted by PitOnTheProwl
I would think most of the people who give you images to use would enjoy the fact that their animal was of quality to use  Might even be cool to have a:
Morph-XXXXXX
Owner-YYYYYYY
Somewhere on the image link so people know who's animal they are looking at and the owner feels good about getting credit for their animal as well 
I will undoubtedly give credit lol. picture submitted by: XXXX
Last edited by OhhWatALoser; 03-01-2011 at 05:23 PM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|