» Site Navigation
0 members and 587 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,136
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
-
-
Re: Dominant or incomplete dominant?????
 Originally Posted by Deborah
Definition of super could make this correct or incorrect.
If by super they mean homozygous, then it is incorrect.
something being recessive, co-dom, or dom has to do with the phenotype (the observable trait)
Recessive = heterozygous - No change in phenotype
Co-dom = both homozygous and heterozygous have a change in phenotype
dom = both homozygous and heterozygous have the same change in phenotype.
i might as go in depth about why
"aa" or normal is still a set of genes. genes dominate or partially dominate over other genes, we classify them by what we can observe, its not just looks, like with blood type they can run tests and observe whats different.
for recessive trait, the heterozygous form "Aa" the "a" or normal gene dominates over the "A" thats why we don't see any difference in the het albinos or any recessive morph, we have to get an "AA" or homozygous to express the albino trait. there is no "a" to dominate over it.
for a co-dom, the heterozygous form "Aa" the"A" gene only partially expresses, it interacts with the "a" gene. while it still needs to be "AA" to fully express. we all know snakes but an example outside of that would be some flowers, white is normal "aa" the heterozygous "Aa" is pink and the homozygous "AA" is red. they the white and red genes both interact with each other, that what goes on in every co-dom we know, its interacting with the normal. lesser-BEL pastel-Super pastel ect. the heterozygous version is always interacting with a normal gene.
Dominate gene expresses the same way no matter if it heterozygous or homozygous. it does not interact with the normal gene it just dominates over it.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Dominant or incomplete dominant?????
 Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser
show me the differences
I'd love to see that too...
I have a Butter/Lesser BEL and I asked him and he said there's no difference...
Lucifer Sam, Siam cat...
Always sitting by your side,
Always by your side...
That cat's something I can't explain...
-
-
Incomplete Dominance is red + white = pink. Incomplete dominance is a form of intermediate inheritance in which one allele for a specific trait is not completely dominant over the other allele. This results in a combined phenotype.
codominance is red + white = red and white striped. Codominance is quite similar to incomplete dominance in that neither parental trait is dominant nor recessive. However, with codominance, the two traits both appear in the offspring, often showing up in different parts of the plant or animal.
We call ball pythons that produce a "super" homo form a codom and ones that don't we call dominant.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to TessadasExotics For This Useful Post:
-
Registered User
Re: Dominant or incomplete dominant?????
I also think Butter and Lesser are similar but not the same, for instance, A kingpin pastel and an emperor pin should have the exact same markings if they are the same, and, I'll give you that some of them are similar. But I've never seen a kingpin pastel with the awesome desert camo kind of look that I love about a good Emperor Pin.
Now if you bred a lemon blast female to both lesser and butter males and ended up with a yellowish tan snake with brown slightly blushed pinstripe markings and dashed lines on the back and sides... I'll admit you've have a hard time identifiying exactly what you've got.
Last edited by NewParadigms; 01-24-2011 at 09:26 AM.
-
-
Re: Dominant or incomplete dominant?????
 Originally Posted by NewParadigms
I also think Butter and Lesser are similar but not the same, for instance, A kingpin pastel and an emperor pin should have the exact same markings if they are the same, and, I'll give you that some of them are similar. But I've never seen a kingpin pastel with the awesome desert camo kind of look that I love about a good Emperor Pin.
Now if you bred a lemon blast female to both lesser and butter males and ended up with a yellowish tan snake with brown slightly blushed pinstripe markings and dashed lines on the back and sides... I'll admit you've have a hard time identifiying exactly what you've got.
With the huge variations that just the Butters/Lessers show, using three-gene animals as a reference is not a very convincing argument...
Lucifer Sam, Siam cat...
Always sitting by your side,
Always by your side...
That cat's something I can't explain...
-
-
Re: Dominant or incomplete dominant?????
 Originally Posted by NewParadigms
I also think Butter and Lesser are similar but not the same, for instance, A kingpin pastel and an emperor pin should have the exact same markings if they are the same, and, I'll give you that some of them are similar. But I've never seen a kingpin pastel with the awesome desert camo kind of look that I love about a good Emperor Pin.
Now if you bred a lemon blast female to both lesser and butter males and ended up with a yellowish tan snake with brown slightly blushed pinstripe markings and dashed lines on the back and sides... I'll admit you've have a hard time identifiying exactly what you've got.
and the pastel or pin used plays no effect? come on...
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|