Quote Originally Posted by OhhWatALoser View Post
maybe if i put the words "I feel" in front of it? tho it is pretty much the definition of hypocritical lol. and yes this is exactly what i was looking for ty

how would you feel it reworded this way... If you don't like them, no one is forcing you to own or like them, but if you think there is something wrong with others owning them, I feel that is closed minded and hypocritical. This morph has been doing great in the ball python world since 1999

I mean, I think it depends on what you're planning on using it for. If you're planning on making a web page with morph writeups that is heavily colored by your own opinions -- a bit more like Ralph Davis's site -- then that's fine, and frankly you can do whatever you want ... Heck, you can say whatever you want no matter what you're using it for, but IMO if you're looking to create an impersonal database of morph knowledge, I wouldn't put anything terribly opinionated.

I guess the thing is, I really don't see how it's hypocritical for someone to disapprove of breeding spiders (unless the person also bred, say, fainting goats or neuro Enigma leopard geckos -- then it WOULD be the definition of hypocritical!). Closed-minded, maybe, though I don't think it's that, either ...

Also, the terms dominant and recessive DO refer to phenotypes. NOT genotypes. That's a common misconception. Therefore, it is perfectly possible for one given phenotypic manifestation of a gene to be dominant while another is recessive. And if you don't believe me, it is even on Wikipedia, the Source of All Knowledge of Everything (okay not really but it IS on Wikipedia):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominan...is_dominant.3F