Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,020

0 members and 1,020 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

Jchipowsky (44)

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,143
Posts: 2,572,365
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #10
    BPnet Veteran tonkatoyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-15-2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    792
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 318 Times in 240 Posts

    Re: So would you consider a Pied Genetically Incomplete Dominate?

    Quote Originally Posted by JLC View Post
    Wouldn't you then see pieds pop up in clutches of leopard x leopard?
    Perhaps the reason you do not see pied's is because the leopard gene works like the platty daddy genetics. Platties can make lessers but lessers together do not make platties. It requires the platty sib to make a platty daddy. The leopard gene may be a dominant gene that allows the pied to come forth, but only when mixed with a pied gene...I believe it is possible in genetics for one gene to be dominant over another but recessive to others. I have always heard that baldness is dominant when mixed with the male "Y" gene but recessive when matched with the "X" in woman. I may be wrong but there it is just the same, something to chew on.
    Last edited by tonkatoyman; 12-01-2010 at 10:50 AM. Reason: spelling

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1