Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,124

2 members and 1,122 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,917
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,202
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Necbov
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Threaded View

  1. #15
    BPnet Lifer mainbutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-30-2008
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    5,690
    Thanks
    269
    Thanked 1,374 Times in 1,053 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: Female Fire, $$ question.

    Quote Originally Posted by sookieball View Post
    well for one thing.. there is no such thing as het lucy....

    fire, russo, mojo, lesser/butter/... they aren't het for BEL's

    they just produce them.. its their super.. dont listen to someone say oh they are het for ivory..
    yellowbelly x yellowbelly = super yellowbellies (ivory) and yellowbelly's
    .
    .
    so a fire is not het for BEL's
    its just a product of selective breeding. no het required like pieds...
    Please don't take offense at this, but..

    WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. What you said is the EXACT opposite of 'correct'.. lol.

    Heterozygous does NOT mean 'looks normal but carries a recessive trait'.

    A diploid organism is heterzygous at a locus if it carries only one copy of a particular allele.. in this case, the fire is simply the heterozygous expression of the allele that causes black-eyed leucies in the homozygous expression of the trait.

    So yes, patels are hets. Super pastels are homozygotes. Yellowbellies are heterozygotes. Ivories are homozygotes.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to mainbutter For This Useful Post:

    snakesRkewl (10-26-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1