Female Fire, $$ question.

[Russ Lawson]

russ, not trying to argue, but clarify...

i dont even know how to word this.

what i was saying is that mojo, lesser/butters, russo's, fires,

they all can produce BEL's in any mix of the bunch,

your odds differ from which mix u mix up....

but a mojave is not het. its a homozygote carrier. base morph who's super form is a white snake with black eyes.

i get what your saying, but its proven.

have you ever heard or seen a het.for mojo x het.for lesser cross to produce BEL's?

im sorry if i seem rude its just what i have gathered from what i have read, seen and expierienced.


and just read what you replied... i guess its technically het. leuc.

but if that was the case, wouldn't it be acurate to say that super pastel is the product of 2 hets?

Your odds don't change at all no matter which combination you use from the BEL complex (which fire is not a part of). Any BEL will yield all heterozygous offspring when bred to a normal. Just which hets those are depend solely on what cross made the BEL. And yes, mojave x lesser makes a BEL (it may look like different odds if two different mutations made it, but put into a punnet square it works essentially the same). This is because the mutations are two different alleles of the same gene. Typically combinations from the same complex like this will be visually similar to either homozygote. You don't seem rude, just a bit misunderstood. And yes, super pastel is absolutely a product of two hets - pastels are just visual hets.