Question for Bill & Tom & Anyone Else with "Specials"

[AaronP]

That really wasnt the question, and it is not selective breeding. I wasnt selectively breeding the female to produce any combos, or lighten up existing combos. I was breeding morphs to a normal to reproduce the morphs. Holding back the Pastel Special female could have been considered selective breeding, but once the Special proved out it was what it was.
When you have a reproduceable morphs with a Super at what point does it not become selective breeding? How is a visible difference between a proven morph and normals just selective breeding? How is breeding any morph not selective breeding from what you just said?

What I meant was that you held that animal back because of how it looked, obviously the majority of the motivation was that it was a Pastel and a female that you needed, if it were an ugly pastel female would you have held it back anyway?

You probably would have if you cared more about the Pastel gene but frankly, it was a stroke of luck, at least with the way you've put it.

Anyway, Jeff has answered my question so at this point we're just talking to be talking. But thanks for rambling with me.

Here you go, Aaron.

They are pretty obviously significant..

http://heathersherpsblog.blogspot.co...cial-blog.html

Thanks Heather.