Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 805

0 members and 805 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,103
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 88

Threaded View

  1. #28
    BPnet Veteran Matt K's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2009
    Posts
    573
    Thanks
    97
    Thanked 178 Times in 132 Posts

    Re: If it's ok to...

    Quote Originally Posted by SK_Exotics View Post
    Why use a word other than euthanize?
    It wouldnt be to add ambiguity to the act, would it?
    Which is why of course they used it in the kids novel...
    The word 'cull' is used in the natural sciences, and is a more appropriate word to use in this case, as it carries with it connotations of removing an animal from a gene pool based on undesirable genetic traits or defects. Like euthanasia, culling almost always implies putting the animal down as a means of doing so. It doesn't add ambiguity at all, in fact, it gives us additional information.

    Cheers,
    -Matt


    R.I.P. Steve, I'll miss you more than you could have ever known. I love you.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Matt K For This Useful Post:

    cinderbird (07-07-2010),h00blah (07-07-2010),Jay_Bunny (07-07-2010),Oxylepy (07-07-2010),Quiet Tempest (07-07-2010),rabernet (07-07-2010),Sariel (07-07-2010)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1