Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 560

0 members and 560 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran GenePirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-11-2009
    Location
    Coastal South Carolina
    Posts
    249
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 101 Times in 73 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by alan1 View Post
    not 'DH' no...
    Uh, yes.

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran GenePirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-11-2009
    Location
    Coastal South Carolina
    Posts
    249
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 101 Times in 73 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by alan1 View Post

    correct, but - that would be 'mis-labeling' the animal

    Of course, but it is a true statement that there would be a 66% chance that the animal was het for both traits in that hypothetical circumstance. This appears to be the only way that the seller (mentioned in the OP's post) could be telling the truth, however incomplete, about his/her 66% double hets. Breeding a DH to a DH will not get 66% DHs. This is what the OP was concerned about.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran tonkatoyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-15-2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    792
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 318 Times in 240 Posts

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by GenePirate View Post
    Of course, but it is a true statement that there would be a 66% chance that the animal was het for both traits in that hypothetical circumstance. This appears to be the only way that the seller (mentioned in the OP's post) could be telling the truth, however incomplete, about his/her 66% double hets. Breeding a DH to a DH will not get 66% DHs. This is what the OP was concerned about.
    I have a question. In the breeding of DH to DH would the odds be greater than 66% that you would at least receive one of the mutations (regardless of which one it is) in the animal, or would it stay at 66%. What is the calculation to arrive at the figure.

  4. #14
    Old enough to remember. Freakie_frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2004
    Location
    221b Baker Street
    Posts
    16,636
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 3,884 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 107

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by tonkatoyman View Post
    I have a question. In the breeding of DH to DH would the odds be greater than 66% that you would at least receive one of the mutations (regardless of which one it is) in the animal, or would it stay at 66%. What is the calculation to arrive at the figure.
    As with any DH to DH breeding statically the odds are Very GOOD..i.e. breeding Pewter X Pewter still give's each animal that isn't a Double Homo a 66% chance of being a Het for both traits which means in something like a Pewter x Pewter breeding each egg only has a 6.25% chance at being a normal..which means there is a 93.75% chance that every animal will carry at least one copy of some Morph gene.
    Last edited by Freakie_frog; 06-14-2010 at 04:48 PM.
    When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban
    "for the discerning collector"



  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran tonkatoyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-15-2009
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    792
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 318 Times in 240 Posts

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by Freakie_frog View Post
    As with any DH to DH breeding the statically the odds are the same..i.e. breeding Pewter X Pewter still give's each animal that isn't a Double Homo a 66% chance of being a Het for both traits which means in something like a Pewter x Pewter breeding each egg only has a 6.25% chance at being a normal..which means there is a 93.75% chance that every animal will carry at least one copy of some Morph gene.
    WOW bought him books and sent him to school, and he read them instead of eating them. LOL

  6. #16
    Old enough to remember. Freakie_frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2004
    Location
    221b Baker Street
    Posts
    16,636
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 3,884 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 107

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by tonkatoyman View Post
    WOW bought him books and sent him to school, and he read them instead of eating them. LOL
    Nobody said I still didn't eat them..just read them first.
    When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban
    "for the discerning collector"



  7. #17
    BPnet Veteran Ash's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-09-2009
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    377
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 89 Times in 61 Posts

    Re: 66% Double Hets question

    Quote Originally Posted by GenePirate View Post
    Exactly. That would be the 66% chance that you'd have both genes in the same animal.
    I think she's right on that one. Given the fact that the animal definitely carries one gene, there remains a 66% chance it carries the other too. So, there's a 66% chance that it carries both, otherwise it only carries one. I think that's the only situation in which the term '66% possible double het' could be kinda true.

    I doubt sellers are gonna stop calling their possible double hets "66%" any time soon either way, regardless of how they were produced. At least the consumer can know better :-)
    0.1 07 Normal "Bigsnake"
    1.0 08 Lesser "Congo"
    1.0 12 Piebald "Pixel"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1