Terry Cullen raided

[wolfy-hound]

"Suspician of neglect" is not "neglect".

If he was told by an agency that he didn't need permits, then the agency is going to say "well SOME are covered by that.. but not all" then the agency sounds like they are backing out of a previous arrangement.

Again, nothing has said that the animals looked neglected in any of the things we've seen, and since the media seemed disturbed that some animals were housed in plastic bins and water troughs, which WE know are appropriate enclosures, I wouldn't expect for the MEDIA to get anything right.

And the police still haven't said who the person was that they were supposed to be searching for in the first place is. Is it Terry and they just won't say because they are hoping he'll come in if he isn't certain it's him? Or was it some employee and some other people jumped the gun because they saw animals housed in what experianced people KNOW is a proper manner?

Why is the building condemned? And if it's that bad, why isn't there more about the issues of the building? There's no way that dead animals and feces and such could be so bad that the whole building has to be condemned and the neighbors had no idea anything was being housed there. We have a local lady with 15 cats in her house, and you can smell it from the street. And her house isn't condemned.

IF he is guilty of some sexual crime, IF he neglected the animals, or left them in inadequate care to be neglected, IF he did not have permits and was NOT told that he did not need them, IF IF IF..

If he was housing the animals in an area that he was not allowed to do so accordingt o zoming, then yes, they coudl remove them, but the more normal way they do these things is to issue a warning and say "You have to get rid of these animals by XX date". Not wholesale snatching them up and taking off with them.