Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 900

0 members and 900 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,908
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,125
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #8
    BPnet Veteran snakecharmer3638's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-30-2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    917
    Thanks
    329
    Thanked 171 Times in 126 Posts
    Images: 26

    Re: White Stands by Ban of Daley; But Diaz Attack on 'Mayhem' Doesn't Warrant Punishm

    I don't think that Daley should have been fired and banned for life from the UFC. But I do agree.. I think Dana did it to send a message. I don't think he would have done this if it were one of his top fighters like Brock or GSP. Sad to say, but Daley, even though he is a good fighter, is not a fan favorite yet. So it was easy for Dana to let him go because people don't buy pay-per-views to see Daley. And so Dana let's go of a fighter who is still building a fan base and sends a message that the UFC is not like Stikeforce.

    Almost forgot: I do think that Dana should have enforced some type of punishment on Nate. He represents the UFC no matter where he is or what he's doing.
    Last edited by snakecharmer3638; 05-13-2010 at 11:33 AM.
    ***Tony S.***

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1