Quote Originally Posted by dbherp View Post
Thanks for all the comments everyone.

There have been three supers produced so far so I'm not sure why you'd say the one shown in the photos isn't a super? We also produced a couple crosses but they weren't anything jaw dropping. We do have plans to breed them into other morphs but I am going to be selling a couple and wanted a name for them.

The whole story is in the link at the bottom of my first post.
David, I did not mean to offend. Just sincerely trying to give you another perspective on managing a project.

I am of the camp of conservatism when naming and MARKETING new stuff -- particularly when it is SUBTLE/SIMILAR to other existing morphs. The fact that you have produced a subtle Supers and "less than jaw-dropping" combos are all the MORE REASON to do some more breeding with the gene. It really is the best way to introduce a morph and get its' "full/true value" of an animal -- just an opinion -- does not make it gospel. Although, there are no doubt any number of folks working CH and WC genes that would surely agree with my perspective. Do wish you only good things.