Thanks for all the comments everyone.
There have been three supers produced so far so I'm not sure why you'd say the one shown in the photos isn't a super? We also produced a couple crosses but they weren't anything jaw dropping. We do have plans to breed them into other morphs but I am going to be selling a couple and wanted a name for them.
The whole story is in the link at the bottom of my first post.
Originally Posted by Bill Buchman
I agree that it is VERY POSSIBLE that the animal on the right is not the super -- it is not consistent with the super of similar hyper-melanistic morphs. Many morphs can be HIGHLY variable -- even with in the same clutch.
I do like the looks of it!!If it were me, I would do a little more breeding -- at least a combo. I certainly know how exciting it is to work with something new.
I have no less than 5 animals that I have proven dominant and/or have produced combos from that have not been formally named, have not been made public, and have not been offered for sale -- because I am not sure what they are and am waiting to breed for the super. As difficult as it is, I really do believe it is best to be conservative and measured when proving new morphs.
Nice project and best of luck.
Reply With Quote