Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 843

0 members and 843 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,120
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-22-2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 310 Times in 101 Posts

    WI to Declassify Animals as Property

    Here is just an exert from this document. Those in Wisconsin need to take action on this!

    "LRB-0677/2 repeals 173.12 (1m) to (3) of the state statutes. In this section, our current law sets fair requirements for the handling of any animal that is considered to be evidence in an alleged animal crime directing that "the animal shall be retained in custody". If the charges are dismissed or the owner is found not guilty, the animal "shall be returned to the owner". There are directives for the disposal of animals that were involved in fighting and provisions for the placement of the animal(s)... "after the owner's conviction".
    horse

    The elimination of these provisions clears the way for humane societies and so-called animal protection organizations, such as HSUS, to legally sell, sterilize, or euthanize animals, as they see fit, that come into their possession prior to when the owner has their day in court. If the charges are determined to be baseless or the rightful owner is found innocent, the person will have no lawful right to reclaim their animal(s). However, this is in conflict with Wisconsin State Statute 968.20 because it specifically refers to the portions of 173.12 for handling animal cases that HSUS & DCHS are trying to eradicate with their bill. (18)

    Clearly, this unconstitutional effort to declassify animals as property, depriving the rightful owner of Equal Protection and Due Process is discriminatory and reprehensible.

    But I've only scratched the surface of this trojan horse.

    The "reasonable grounds" definition comes into play in Section 10. 173.21 (1)(a): "There are reasonable grounds to believe that the owner has mistreated the animal in violation of ch. 951 or has violated s. 951.08." So if the facts get in the way, opinion, theory, suspicion... or even less... is all that's needed to proceed!

    The bill adds a new condition to existing requirements for the release and return of the animal to it's owner; that it be implanted with a microchip for identification. In an informal survey of veterinary clinics around the state, I found that prices to microchip an animal vary widely ranging from $25 to as high as $112 (with an office call), per animal. This stipulation could impose a financial hardship, especially if the person has a number of animals they are forced to chip."

    www.spanieljournal.com/46lbaughan.html
    Specialty Serpents
    www.specialtyserpents.com

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to ER12 For This Useful Post:

    MTovar (03-01-2010)

  3. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    02-05-2010
    Posts
    137
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 88 Times in 60 Posts

    Re: WI to Declassify Animals as Property

    Wow, this is just terrible, as expected from this type of group. Hopefully this is stopped, otherwise Wisconsin residents could be in a world of hurt.

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-22-2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 310 Times in 101 Posts

    Updated Red Alert for Wisconsin

    Public Hearing Thursday, March 11, 10:15 AM AB-793, if passed will seriously
    impact 14th amendment rights. Similar to the Louisville law that was struck
    down recently, this legislation allows for seizure bonds for animals taken
    before a conviction. If an individual was not able to post a bond, the
    legislation would allow for the animals to be placed.

    http://dfow.net/2010AB793AndSB580-BondsRequired.pdf
    Specialty Serpents
    www.specialtyserpents.com

  5. #4
    BPnet Veteran steveboos's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-21-2009
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,535
    Thanks
    296
    Thanked 317 Times in 299 Posts

    Re: Updated Red Alert for Wisconsin

    This is beyond crazy, i really hope this doesn't pass. Animals are animals and they have souls and feelings, don't treat them like a freaking bag of trash that you can throw away. I hate when legislators try to pass things that obviously wont work in the long run and do more harm than good.
    6.5.15 Animals
    1.2 Pomeranian's
    0.1.15 Tropical Fish
    2.2 Snakes:
    0.1 2009 100% Het Piebald
    0.1 Normal
    1.0 Green Tree Python
    1.0 Brazilian Rainbow Boa

  6. #5
    Registered User EsotericForest's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-07-2010
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: Updated Red Alert for Wisconsin

    How rediculous can you get. They don't have any right to do this. I need to move out of this state haha

  7. #6
    Registered User Derrick13's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-29-2009
    Posts
    168
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts

    Re: WI to Declassify Animals as Property

    " oooo Canadaaa!" lol

  8. #7
    Registered User EsotericForest's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-07-2010
    Posts
    39
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Re: WI to Declassify Animals as Property

    Our home and native land

    I have a lot of Canadian in my ancestry...perhaps I should consider heading there instead. It just seems like slowly the government is making it impossible to own animals, especially exotics.

  9. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-28-2008
    Location
    BC. Canada
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 74 Times in 28 Posts

    Re: WI to Declassify Animals as Property

    Quote Originally Posted by EsotericForest View Post
    Our home and native land

    I have a lot of Canadian in my ancestry...perhaps I should consider heading there instead. It just seems like slowly the government is making it impossible to own animals, especially exotics.
    Well here in Canada at least in BC we are NOT doing much better new laws are getting suggested and radical groups are trying hard to destroy the keeping of animals here too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1