Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 602

0 members and 602 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,110
Posts: 2,572,152
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Threaded View

  1. #5
    BPnet Veteran Bruceweb's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-18-2009
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    529
    Thanks
    111
    Thanked 111 Times in 76 Posts
    Images: 64

    Re: Super firefly pied

    Quote Originally Posted by kc261 View Post
    On the clutches from the pastel females, you won't be able to know if the babies are hets or not, because you won't be able to know which is the father. Obviously the clutch from the pied female will all be 100% hets (or visual pieds) regardless of the father.

    Here is the problem.

    pewter x pastel can yield:
    normal
    pastel
    super pastel
    cinnamon
    pewter
    sterling

    pied x pastel can yield:
    normal het pied
    pastel het pied

    So, you will know that any super pastels, cinnamons, pewters, or sterlings are NOT het pied, but any normals or pastels could be from either father, so they might or might not be hets.

    This is why it is not recommended to use multiple males when one of the males is a recessive morph. You can't know which babies are hets and which aren't. There are exceptions, but you have to be extremely careful about that type of pairings. For example, in your first pairing, since the female is pied, you'll know all babies are at least het pied if not visual, so multiple fathers doesn't matter. Another possibility is to have the other possible father be a super form of a co-dom morph that is not carried by the female. With your pastel females, if the father other than the pied had been a super pastel, you still could not know if any pastel hatchlings were het pied or not, because they could have come from the super pastel father, or from the pied father and the pastel mother. At least in that case you would know any normals were het pied. However, you could have used a super cinnamon as the second father. That way, any cinnamons or pewters would not be het pied, but any pastels or normals would be het pied.
    Thanks Casey..re the pastels I am working on the basis that if any clutches are only pastel & normal I will view them as het (they will be held back for myself so wont matter) if it is a pewter combination I will assume co doms, allthough that cant rule out a split clutch..they are all going to be holdbacks for future plans so either way it cant hurt..wonder if pastel het pieds carry the markers like the normal hets
    My thoughts on any hets carrying the pastel gene will be used to try for pastel pieds, once produced I think adding the fire gene would give some amazingly clean pastel pieds
    Last edited by Bruceweb; 02-21-2010 at 01:28 PM.
    Bruce

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1