» Site Navigation
0 members and 761 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,908
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,126
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Mississippi H1293
 Originally Posted by Freakie_frog
Things like the cane toad, or if fed the right diet dart frog there are even newts in CA that are toxic. It's simply put in the to cover their bases..
Yeah, but those are amphibians, not reptiles. Are there poisonous reptiles?
-
-
Re: Mississippi H1293
Originally Posted by kc261
Yeah, but those are amphibians, not reptiles. Are there poisonous reptiles?
Good point!!
When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban "for the discerning collector"
-
-
Registered User
Re: Mississippi H1293
Originally Posted by Freakie_frog
Just so every one is aware the law is for "Reptiles". There "poisonous" reptiles so the language is correct..
Another thing to look at with this language is that depending what literature they are using and how old, all snakes are considered constrictors there is also the true constrictors which is what we all know. Broad based language covers just a little too much and can be used for a wide interpretation.
-
-
Re: Mississippi H1293
Originally Posted by snakemastercanada
Another thing to look at with this language is that depending what literature they are using and how old, all snakes are considered constrictors there is also the true constrictors which is what we all know. Broad based language covers just a little too much and can be used for a wide interpretation.
Exactly which is why I plan to meet with my local State government and see exactly what they plan and what exactly they are trying to achieve..because we all know there are only two ways a snake kills its prey..Venom and constriction.
Last edited by Freakie_frog; 02-03-2010 at 10:20 AM.
When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban "for the discerning collector"
-
-
-
-
Re: Mississippi H1293
Originally Posted by Louis Kirkland
For those who'd rather skip the trip, or perhaps can't view it, it says the bill died in committee! Woohoo!!!!! That's one victory for our side!
I think we should be on the lookout though... in case it just died because it was too broad or something, and a new, "improved" version shows up soon.
-
-
Re: Mississippi H1293
Originally Posted by kc261
For those who'd rather skip the trip, or perhaps can't view it, it says the bill died in committee! Woohoo!!!!! That's one victory for our side!
I think we should be on the lookout though... in case it just died because it was too broad or something, and a new, "improved" version shows up soon.
The word I got from a staffer was that the MS Dept of Wildlife didn't feel that there was enough threat to warrant the bill..
When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban "for the discerning collector"
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Reply With Quote
