Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 670

1 members and 669 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,110
Posts: 2,572,148
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 64

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Registered User dsmalex97's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-01-2008
    Posts
    419
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 30 Times in 26 Posts

    Re: guess which is which...again, sorry sarin haha

    Quote Originally Posted by mason View Post
    No one is getting agro, you just don't make much sense.

    Your logic is flawed, someone "not into balls" of course woldn't know a fire from a lesser from a clown form a normal.

    All of our collective points are that fires do not looklike normals, either as hatchlings or as adults. People can't tell the difference because they can be hard to photograph, like I said it helps to have seen them in person not just via kingsnake.

    I'd love to see any picture of a normal that looks as good as these nice fires that are being posted, adult fires look as clearly different to normal royals as adult hypos do and even a novice/non ball keeper can tell the two are different even if they don't know (or care) why.

    Well. How come I showed someone not into snakes a bunch of pictures of morphs and he could clearly show me which is different from normal. I showed him a spider, lesser, genetic stripe, pastel, and a mojave. Every single one he was able to point out, EXCEPT when I compared a normal to fire. He wouldn't be able to tell sometimes. Sometimes he would and would say is that one just lighter? You guys really are blowing this out of proportion and now I feel stupid now for posting this. You all have a terrible way of boasting your opinion, and have a great way of making someone feel stupid. All I was TRYING to do was say that fires CAN sometimes be confused for normals. You all act like I was insulting your intelligence saying you can't tell the difference or something. Listen, pretend I never posted this because it seems all of you missed the point horrendously and were only out to prove me wrong on this. Honestly I could careless about your opinion anymore because I have NORMAL people proving me right everytime. Your all snake dorks of course its obvious to you. I think all you fire owners just got a little upset because I compared your 300$ morph to 30$. I've seen them in person and I do enjoy looking at them because I DO know what to look for. I do know what makes them different and awesome in there own right. And I DO know because I have eyes, and I'm a human being that the appearance of this snake is normalish. IF you cannot understand that, well then I am sorry that we don't possess the same eyeballs and the same logic because appparantly mine doesn't make much sense. But explain to me what is so hard about admitting that the Fire has a normal looking pattern? NOTHING! I can see it being hard if you own one and spent money,, but get over your investment. It is what it is. STill a beauty, but not as eye popping as some other snakes. This was just supposed to be a fun little comparison that Fire can SOMETIMES(not always) be confused as normals if were not as smart as all of you of course. But you had to ruin it with your god awful opinions, and YOUR logic which doesn't make sense to the average joe, which is what counts because the average joe is what helps the hobby grow.

    and btw beardeddragon you really think I picked normal snakes? Are you that ignorant? You must be dumb question...But, anyway think what you want bro. I have no idea what I am talking about...I've never seen a Fire your right. In fact I have never seen a morph EVER. So my opinion really means jack anyway so why even argue. Your right, I'm wrong. Its funny though because only on this site is it possible to prove an opinion wrong because of all the hot headed idiots. And its also funny because there was a fire pictured there, and you thought it was normal lmao!!! So basically, you proved my point again. What a waste of time, and something that could have been fun comparison. Did you all just get mad because you didn't know which was which or something? Did I finally fool the pros haha? Thats gotta be it!!!
    Last edited by dsmalex97; 01-30-2010 at 02:12 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1