I believe that some of that language was removed from the bill at the last hearing, originally it was included. However there is a push to not only have that language added back, but to increase the number of species affected by it. What you're seeing is the bill in it's current state. What the recent hearing was about was how to amend it in further ways which you won't see on the bill until it's amended and voted on by the committee.
(I think I got that right)