TOFFEE Ball PROVEN

[Toronto Python Gurus]

TALKING IN CAPS MAKES A POINT.
Calm down please.

People will simply skip over your post because your trying to yell, which is annoying. But here's the part that got me.

Where are you getting that from? If there have been toffees produced, then people have seen the hatchling version as well. I've seen some at shows too.
This is not a debate, because it is far too one sided. Experienced breeders are saying that they see an Albino, not anything else. They provide back-up information with their theory of why it's only an Albino, so please, give us some back up information of why it is a Toffee.
IF you can prove that it is in fact a Toffee, we'd all be very happy to know that it is in fact not an albino. We're not saying "It's an albino!" because that's what we want it to be..
No one is saying that it may not turn out to be an actual Toffee, but by the way it looks and the experience present, that it doesn't look too hopeful.

Toffee's haven't been produced yet that's why this is a debate on the OP's picture of an Albino looking snake, unless the Candy is the same as a Toffee, but IMHO there is something different between those two morphs, as far as I know the Urban Python Let 5 het pairs go in 2007 they haven't produced anything from Het x Het pairings and the Toffee x Het pairings didn't prove anything out either the females ended up being to small to produce a clutch