Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 779

0 members and 779 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,106
Posts: 2,572,115
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Threaded View

  1. #36
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    06-09-2008
    Location
    Clermont, FL
    Posts
    709
    Thanks
    106
    Thanked 216 Times in 146 Posts

    Re: UPDATE: HR2811 Amendment

    Quote Originally Posted by JandDReptiles View Post
    not until September... at the earliest.




    This doesn't spell the end of the Burm or Af. Rock right now. It won't until the President puts his OBAMA on it...hehe. That will be a WHILE from now. In the article it states that USARK is going to work on ammending the bill further to only ban the importation of WC Burms and Af. Rocks. We shall see where it goes from here....


    -Jeremy
    Even if it was reduced to WC Burms and Afrocks, there is still ZERO benefit to this if it becomes law. I suggest our stance from here on out to be that this undermines the provisions set by the Lacey Act, and that it should be thrown out entirely and those provisions should be followed. That is all they should have the right to do, and this should not be an issue we have to compromise on no matter how many animal rights activists and environmentalists whine and moan about it.
    Last edited by dr del; 07-29-2009 at 08:55 PM. Reason: replacing censored words with italicised alternatives

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Russ Lawson For This Useful Post:

    Denial (07-29-2009),neilgolli (08-03-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1