Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 651

1 members and 650 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,105
Posts: 2,572,114
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Threaded View

  1. #18
    West Coast Jungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-07-2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,184
    Thanks
    624
    Thanked 1,370 Times in 943 Posts
    Images: 43

    Re: UPDATE: HR2811 Amendment

    Hey Mike I dont know is your read this study by Tracy Barker that someone posted recently.

    http://vpi.com/sites/vpi.com/files/O...compressed.pdf

    It says that the burmese is not an invasive species. That is just a tag that has been put on them by the folks who want to ban them.

    Yes they are in the everglades as well as 100's of non native animals(and plants for that matter) whom are also in the Everglades but that does not make them invasive and yet the burm is the only one getting any attention

    This term is being used without any scientific proof to advance an agenda. Just because it is there does not make it a threat. That is what they want you to believe but REAL scientific research says different.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to West Coast Jungle For This Useful Post:

    Denial (07-29-2009),Mendel's Balls (07-29-2009),Mike Cavanaugh (07-29-2009),neilgolli (07-29-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1