Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,362

0 members and 1,362 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,130
Posts: 2,572,295
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #16
    BPnet Veteran chromeitout's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-26-2008
    Location
    Upstate SC
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts

    Re: Already breeding, but not enough...

    I understand the "check them" thing, but what I'm talking about is keeping track of the individuals that continually have low numbers and should be replaced by new females, due to age or whatever. There is no way that I could remember on looks alone of a particular female that she is a poor producer in a rotating community. I totally understand how the moving around part works, but the question about records is regarding efficiency.

    Edit: Also, if there are no records kept in this type of setup you could very possibly have females in the breeding colony taking up space that never get pregnant at all and you wouldn"t know it. You would just check her, see that she wasn't pregnant and put her back in there until next week when you would do the same thing again.
    Last edited by chromeitout; 07-26-2009 at 11:33 PM.
    6.13 Corns, 4.5 Ball Pythons, 1.0 Mex Mex King, 1.1 Mali Uromastyx, 1.1 Red Saharan Uromastyx, 0.1 ETB, 1.0 Boxer

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1