Thanks for being the first person to actually post something worth reading. I think I had already read that one, and it seems like an objective article. So now we agree that chem trails do exist, and that they have at the least, been used in the past, over U.S. cities. Correct?

The main argument here so far has been that there is no such thing as chem trails, even after I posted main stream articles to the contrary. Since I thought that that was the argument, I was looking for things along the lines of official denial of the existence of chem trails, or libel cases charging investigative journalists, news outlets, websites or government personnel with publishing false claims. Basically anything at all, since I took the time to look for articles that document the use of aerosol spraying over the U.S. population using planes, and all I've seen in return was sheep-like responses, with no real debate.



You keep calling the existence of chem trails a conspiracy theory, and refusing to post any data you might have because it will just be blindlessly discredited as a cover up, yet I posted sources that changed the opinion from theory to legitimate, and I have yet to blindly discredit something here. If you've noticed, I refuse to use shady or subjective articles or sources here. I'm a pretty smart guy, and I have nothing to gain by discrediting anybody without reasonable contrary information. I also never made any claims, and only asked questions and posted some info for debate.