Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 828

0 members and 828 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,067
Threads: 249,217
Posts: 2,572,780
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Inky Clouds
Results 1 to 10 of 141

Threaded View

  1. #19
    BPnet Senior Member Denial's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-21-2009
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Posts
    2,553
    Thanks
    775
    Thanked 657 Times in 327 Posts

    Re: Watch the HR669 Hearing LIVE from your PC!

    I think one of there biggest concerns in not for pet owners but how they could actually reinforce this bill. It would cost millions of dollars to reinforce this bill and they made that clear this morning saying they would need the extra funds to carry this out and thats also how they came up with the applicants paying for the application for permit. Which usually when you apply for a permit you have to pay. I applied for a permit to obtain an endangered species and had to pay 250 dollars for it. But hopefully they relize the affect this would have on all of us and the jobs that are in this industry and also relize how much it would cost to regulate all this and they all vote no to it. But I have a feeling even if it dies today. It will keep coming back over and over again until something is done. Theres just to much bad press out there for all of us and not ANY good press.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Denial For This Useful Post:

    filly77 (04-23-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1