» Site Navigation
2 members and 1,132 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,143
Posts: 2,572,365
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Super Cinny x Blue Eyed Lucy
I don't think that's true, anyone here have actual experience breeding a BEL X Normal to give us answers?
I'll put it this way...
If you breed a Super Lesser to a normal... you get ALL lessers. Super Butter BEL...ALL butters. Super Mojo BEL....ALL mojos.
Well...if you breed a Lesser Mojo BEL X Normal,
Isn't it true the offspring could take, the mojo gene, the lesser gene, or the combination of the two, and can still produce normals? Since the genes are in the same complex, yet are different mutations, you should be able to reproduce a BEL in a mixed BEL to normal pairing.
Because technically it is a combo animal, albeit from the same complex, but it isn't a "homozygous" form of a BEL.
I look at that pairing, like it SHOULD be the same as a Bee X Normal... (a combo of two different mutations)
You can get animals that take BOTH the spider gene and pastel gene...to make a bee, you can get spiders, and you can get pastels, and you can get normals.
I guess I don't understand why it wouldn't be possible, I know I've talked with others who agree that I should be correct...
It's not like we're talking same lines of pastels here, they ARE different mutations (unless we're talking butters and lessers...being the same...JMO), so really that combo BEL should be capable of producing more BELs when bred to a normal... 
That's how I look at it. Anyone do the breedings?
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|