In the hood the Michael Vick situation is commonly viewed as the railroading of an innocent man.The argument is that dog fighting as a sport is the equivalent of deer hunting for other segments of society.The idea of feeling compassion for animals is seen as madness (because after all they are just animals)and it is believed that certain people just couldnt stand to see Mr Vick doing so well for himself and felt compelled to bring him down. I am in no way supporting this position but I am attempting to explain the way that Mr Vicks supporters see the situation.
F' Them. Animal fighting is cruel and ILLEGAL. Do they eat the dogs after they are killed, or quickly put the injured ones out of their misery, then eat them? I hope not.
What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?