Interesting perspective SDA.
You make a lot of sense.
I think the issue here is that the OP disclosed they owned snakes, they granted the adoption, and then changed their mind.
I totally understand that the agencies ultimately want what's best for the animal being placed. Ignoring the issue of whether a house with snakes is okay for a cat, and vice versa, they should have read the adoption application before granting the adoption.
I think that's what's shady here. If they were a well run agency, or the person granting the adoption had done their job, they should have just said NO in the beginning.
That's the part that bothers me the most.









Reply With Quote