» Site Navigation
3 members and 1,710 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,813
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Caramel VS Ultramel
 Originally Posted by Pythonfriend
thats really interesting.
but then: why not still go for it? as long as you know what you have, whats the problem with working with a smaller line that does the same things, if its so much cheaper? like with axanthic, different people work with different lines, and working with a smaller line is fine and its about the resulting optics. and people argue which lines of axanthic look the best. and for each line, there are people working with it.
so, even if they look almost the same but are incompatible (i am not sure yet, there does not seem to be much solid data), why not still go for it?
There's no reason not to go for it, and there should be more results coming out on compatibility in the next few months, although there's enough evidence against it that I'm not hopeful. You would just want to be very certain of which line you're actually getting, because just like axanthics there is a noticeable price difference depending on which line you choose, and they're awfully hard to tell apart.
 Originally Posted by digizure
What do you guys think of the picture I posted? (on the second page)
I think she's cute and I like her.
-Devon
0.1 Axanthic Bee (Pixel)
0.2 Axanthic Pastel (Cornelia, Short Round)
0.1 Axanthic (Bubbles)
0.1 Bee het Axanthic (Nipper)
0.1 Lesser (Lydia)
0.1 het Lavender (Poppy)
0.1 het Hypo (Cookie)
1.0 Killerbee het Axanthic (Yellow Dude)
1.0 Pied (Starry Starry Dude)
1.0 Butter Hypo (Spooky Dude)
1.0 PH Lavender (Little Dude)
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|