Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 693

0 members and 693 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Threaded View

  1. #13
    BPnet Senior Member Andybill's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-04-2012
    Location
    Shelton, Wa
    Posts
    2,958
    Thanks
    1,147
    Thanked 1,319 Times in 1,088 Posts
    Images: 7
    Ok so when considering selective breeding and how quality is affected lets just say you have a decent pastel and assuming you breed it to something that is a darker morph like say mahogany or ghi (I chose these because I think pastel GHIs and Mahoganies are just not very attractive) could a pastel be dirtied up by simply breeding it to something dark like that? I have heard a lot of different things suggesting that characteristics can be passed on without actually passing on the gene in particular. So in the case of breeding dark morphs to pastels could some of the dark characteristics be passed on to the babies even if the gene itself was not? I am not real good with genetics but I know what I like and thats what I plan to breed for. I try not to complicate things. I am not against breeding pastel to darker morphs I think it works in many cases but isnt that part of selective breeding? Deciding not to pair pastel with something because it could just muddy it up? I hope I am not confusing any body.
    -Andrew Hall-

    Good night Chesty, wherever you are....


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Andybill For This Useful Post:

    don15681 (04-11-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1