I think getting Garrick involved and releasing his name was the right thing to do. It clears up confusion of the OP's original question if we know the exact details of the transaction.
Assuming Garrick is in the right, we originally thought the breeder was wrong and a crook based on the OPs word. If Garrick proves his emails(something the OP refused to screen shot), then we know that the OP is the one negated the TOS. This changes everything... Without all the details we would be pushing the OP for a full refund or a replacement animal...
No problem!
Lots of people want to give Doolittle a hug! :3
*hug Doolittle *
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
Aww :p. *hugs back*
Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk 2
If nothing ever changed, there would be no butterflies.
Originally Posted by satomi325
Reply With Quote