Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 566

0 members and 566 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,135
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 77

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran satomi325's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-15-2011
    Location
    In a galaxy far,far away.
    Posts
    6,423
    Thanks
    2,429
    Thanked 3,969 Times in 2,446 Posts
    Images: 5
    Quote Originally Posted by mykee View Post
    How will you determine the difference between a true birth defect and human error (incubator spike, etc)?
    I think a little more thought needs to go into this before "launch".
    Both natural and human error defects are important to document. If documenting all the human error related defects, we could possibly rule out inheritance for those certain traits. And it could possibly be used to improve incubation methods to avoid such error. Just state the defect reasoning in your post.

    Quote Originally Posted by satomi325 View Post
    3) Possible reasoning for the defect (i.e. random defect, incubation temperature drop/spike, affiliated with morph, etc. etc.).


    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
    Last edited by satomi325; 08-26-2012 at 12:59 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1