Quote Originally Posted by snake lab View Post
When working with different lines of the same morph such as pastels for example, it comes down to variants of the offspring. A sterling made from bell line pastel or a sterling made from a lemon may look different be would be variants of the same morph therefore it have to be named as such. If a cinnamon and a black both came from the same wild caught animal then it would be that way throughout the breedings and its not. Both different morphs. Now blacks i think have more variants then cinnies. The blackest super forms of the black pastel comes from outbacks line imo. Those things are jet black
The first part of this I agree with. Bloodlines....same thing, different bloodlines. Again it's all about who can pee the farthest. Different locales of ball have different patterns and coloration. This will make the same morph appear differently from one example to the next. I don't buy the cinny/BP argument and never will. How can black be blacker than black? Same snakes...different lines. Calico...sugar...sprinkle....white-sided....blah blah blah. Mine is bigger than yours mentality. If you have something TRULY different then great. If not, don't try to make things more difficult.

Snakelab, this is not directed at you personally. Just my general thoughts and opinion on the subject. Folks will believe what they want and it will never be solved.