If the bone you have to pick with him is that he was selling animals that had not had their first shed then I think you need to add at least 7 other vendors (that I distinctly remember) to that list.
My bone as you call it would be with your post talking about THAT specific seller.

You are telling people that they are making assumption about some animal not feeding and I am telling you that some of the animals not feeding is not an assumption but a FACT
And again I ask, how can you guarantee that all those animals he was selling had not had their first shed?Did you ask him specifically? Cause if you did not then, yeah, it is speculation. You are speculating that they had not had their first shed and therefore you are speculating that they are not eating.
I did not say all the animals I said several of them did not have their first shed...........again not a speculation on my part, I was there I saw the animals first hand therefore I know that some of the animals did not have their first shed which mean they were not feeding nor possibly could have been guarenteed to be feeding.

For the record I do not need to ask a seller if an animal had his first shed or not I can tell simply by looking at the animal ...........therefore not a speculation but a fact.

Again, I am not defending his prices. But if that is the problem you have with him then just stick to that and quit making things up to add to the "crime".
And I could not care less about his prices what I care about are YOUR statements about people speculating on some of the animals that were not feeding or could not be guarenteed to be feeding.