Humans: Carnivore, Herbivore, or Omnivore?

Since one of our fellow BPers has made the statement that humans are herbivores, and I refuted that with references to a great deal of evidence to the contrary, rather than hijacking the Bullfighting thread, I figured I would go ahead and give it its own arena.

So:
Evidence for omnivory in humans:

Dentition: Cutting surfaces and grinding surfaces evenly arranged. Molars are weak, not up to the task of grinding large amounts of plant matter. Canines are small, but canines are used for grasping prey, not for cutting meat, so are not necessary for an animal that does not kill using its teeth. Number of teeth reduced in modern humans. Jaw size also reduced, indicating a diet that is not high in fibrous or tough materials. Jaw PRESSURE in modern humans is quite impressive, however. We can crack a nut (or a bone) if we have to. In a fossil record, modern humans would be easily identified as omnivores.

Intestinal length: Herbivores use one of two strategies to enable them to digest plant matter--either an extremely long and elaborate digestive system (such as in a cow), or a shorter system that food is passed through more than one time (such as in a rabbit). Carnivores have a short digestive tract, because meat is high in nutrients and extremely simple to digest. Omnivores have a digestive tract that is intermediate between the two. In fact, the human digestive tract is closely comparable in length and structure to that of a pig--a devout omnivore.

Tools: Hominids and great apes are devout tool users. Tool use itself is an interesting adaptation that allows a species to take advantage of a variety of food resources. Some species rely on tool use almost exclusively in order to procure food, such as woodpecker finches. Great apes regularly use tools to procure their food--to crack nuts, for example, to fish for termites, and to kill small animal prey. Our closest living relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees, both kill and eat monkeys fairly regularly to supplement their diets. Female orangutans have also been observed catching and eating small animal prey, and fish. The oldest stone tools we have found created by homonids were clearly designed for pounding, cutting, and scraping. Cutting and scraping are needed for preparing meat, and not for much else. Throughout the progression of homonid tool development, we find increasingly sophisticated tools for preparing meat and hides, and for hunting (such as spearheads).

Behavior: Humans hunt. Even children, left to their own devices, will stalk small animals. Catching butterflies isn't just about the 'pretty'. We have all the instinctive equipment necessary to wait patiently for long periods, to track, and to persist. We enjoy the process of hunting, like all predators.

Physical fitness: Although you wouldn't know it by looking at the average cubicle-dweller, humans are incredible athletes. We are not particularly fast, but we don't have to be fast--we have tremendous endurance, and we can run for miles. Many prey species cannot. As a result, one of the oldest methods of hunting is known as persistance hunting. It involves selecting a large, fit male of a horned animal species, and following it until it drops dead of heat prostration and exhaustion. (The heavy horns tax the animal's strength faster). This is not a rare occurrence, or luck--it is a regular hunting style still practiced by the San people in Africa today. The San are our genetic ancestors, according to gene mapping...they are the oldest surviving lineage of humans on the planet. Humans can climb, dig, swim, jump, and run for miles without stopping. We are superb predators and are capable of grasping any opportunity presented to us.

Culture: The oldest existing human cultures on Earth are omnivorous. In fact, there are no primitive herbivorous cultures. There are primitive carnivorous cultures, however (the Inuit, for example).

Nutrition: Humans require vitamin B-12 in their diet, which is a vitamin that herbivores manufacture in their own gut. B-12 is found primarily in meat. B-12 is a very important vitamin for human health. Non-animal sources of B-12 are few and far between, and were largely or entirely unavailable to primitive peoples (such as yeast). No successful herbivore is unable to manufacture vitamin B-12 for itself.

Other various adaptation (such as digestive fluids and saliva):
As has been pointed out, meat is easy to digest. Vegetable food sources are difficult to digest, so most herbivores will concentrate their efforts on making the vegetation they find palatable actually digestible. It's much harder to digest a leaf than it is to digest a mouse, so more changes are needed to enable the digestion of plant matter. This is the flaw of omnivory:
You can eat many things, but you will not be perfect at eating any of them. Humans are poorly adapted to eating both meat AND plant matter, but they are supremely adaptable because they can derive proper nutrition from eating both.

Evidence for herbivory in humans: ? (I don't know of any).

I like everything, so my vote is Nomnomnivore. :gj:

I'm just going to start this off by stating that I am a vegetarian. I agree that humans seem to be made to be omnivorous, but we are also graced with exceptional intelligence and the ability to feel sympathy, as well as the ability to make our own lifestyle choices. Primitive humans did hunt and were omnivores, but now with all the medical advancements and new technologies humans can also afford to be herbivorous provided the right supplements.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nate

I like everything, so my vote is Nomnomnivore. :gj:

---

Im a nomnomnivore too!! Nomnomnom:chew:

I'm a meatetarian. It's a personal choice; takes a real commitment.

On a scientific level, the vegetarian resource group says we are omnivores:
http://www.vrg.org/nutshell/omni.htm

And on a personal note, I think vegetarians are awesome! They show great commitment to their lifestyle, and eat extremely healthy. If I had more self control, it would be something that I would do. But, unfortunately, it just isn't there.

I am a committed omnivore - I have no desire to go vegetarian or vegan ever. I have great respect for those that do, but it's not my cup of tea.

I think the most conscientious choice is informed omnivory. Permaculture and organic gardening and farming techniques, combined with a in-depth knowledge of the ecosystem and a focus on local food strikes me as far more admirable than vegetarianism that relies on supermarket produce.

Properly raised, naturally grown livestock need not be harmful to the environment--it can be considerably less harmful than growing food crops. Remember--hoofed animals can be grazed on native grasslands, and if proper attention and rotational grazing are employed, they will improve rather than degrade the habitat. Raising food crops in a conventional manner always destroys the native habitat.

It's not enough to know what labels were put on the food (such as 'organic' or 'vegetarian'). You have to know where the food came from and how it was actually produced. Venison steak and rotationally grazed, grass-fed beef is infinitely greener (AND more humane) than factory farm wheat crops soaked in pesticides which ran off into the rivers, and contributed to the oceanic dead zone at the mouth of the Mississippi. The sheer amount of death and suffering caused by fertilizer runoff is staggering to contemplate. Obviously any diet that includes tropical fruits if you do not live in a tropical area is not one that is ecologically sound.

Is it necessary to be ecologically optimal in all areas? I would say, no--it's not always practical, either. But it is important to consider your reasons for various actions that impact your health, and make sure that your logic is sound, and truly fits in with all of the facts.

But then, this was more about what humans are adapted to eat, more than what humans should eat to minimize their negative impact on ecosystems and the environment.

Which members thought we were Herbivores? And why? Thats silly...

We are Omnivore... I mean just look how our teeth are set up, they are not like horse teeth....

Of corse we are omnivores..... but my diet is mostly meat and call me naive but I don't like vegans.... because some of them try to tell us we shouldn't eat meat. Plus nothing sounds good abt a veggie burger.... now that is unnatural!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dc1

Of corse we are omnivores..... but my diet is mostly meat and call me naive but I don't like vegans.... because some of them try to tell us we shouldn't eat meat. Plus nothing sounds good abt a veggie burger.... now that is unnatural!

---

So because you don't like the few vegans that try to force their eating habits on you, you're trying to judge all of them because they don't eat what YOU eat. Brilliant. I'm also loving that you think what goes into most regular hamburgers is natural. Please keep posting, I love it all so far.


To the actual question, I agree with you once again, WingedWolfPsion. For all reasons stated.

I'm vegetarian, but not a strict vegetarian. I still eat chicken and pork. And beef. Sometimes fish. Venison is good too. And bison...

Omnivore for the win.

I have a vegetable, fruit, herb, and flower garden.

I regularly kill and eat the growing things in my garden. I also regularly leave them alive and amputate parts of them to eat.

I regularly kill and eat animals, but I never amputate them and leave them alive, and I certainly never eat them while they are still alive.

Good post WingedWolfPsion :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tikall

So because you don't like the few vegans that try to force their eating habits on you, you're trying to judge all of them because they don't eat what YOU eat. Brilliant. I'm also loving that you think what goes into most regular hamburgers is natural. Please keep posting, I love it all so far.


To the actual question, I agree with you once again, WingedWolfPsion. For all reasons stated.

---

Im a red blooded conservative, what can I say :rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dc1

im a red blooded conservative, what can i say :rofl:

---

:sunny:

I don't think the whole vegetarian thing had the right outcome. I didn't mean it as a "well-we-should-be-vegetarian" kind of thing. I just meant to say that even though we may be built to be omnivores, we are also capable of choice, so we can't really categorize all human beings as omnivores or herbivores or carnivores.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lexxielightning

I don't think the whole vegetarian thing had the right outcome. I didn't mean it as a "well-we-should-be-vegetarian" kind of thing. I just meant to say that even though we may be built to be omnivores, we are also capable of choice, so we can't really categorize all human beings as omnivores or herbivores or carnivores.

---

Oh I totally got that from your post! I only meant that we were -built- for an omnivore diet. In this day though, it's entirely possible to be very healthy with a vegan or vegetarian diet provided it is done correctly.

I think it's important distinguish between being an herbivore, and being a vegetarian.
Humans are omnivores regardless of what they choose to eat--the Inuit aren't carnivorous people simply because they eat animals almost exclusively. They are simply eating what is locally available. The ability to eat things on either extreme is a part of what makes humans adaptable. It's just easier for humans to eat only meat than it is for them to eat only vegetables. That's why the Inuit stay healthy, but you find 0 vegetarian primitive cultures. Vegetarianism is only associated with more advanced cultures...and usually with religion, up until VERY recently, making it a cultural construct.
It is fascinating that some humans actually choose to avoid certain readily available and accepted foods, however. You don't see THAT sort of behavior too often in other species.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Beardedragon

We are Omnivore... I mean just look how our teeth are set up, they are not like horse teeth....

---

Just had to point out that our teeth are vaguely similar to horses :) They have two "wolf teeth" that grown in front of their molars but behind the front teeth, just like our k9s :P They are removed because they cause issues and aren't good for riding horses in a bit.

That said, I'm not sure how anyone can mistake the human as anything but an omnivore. We have all seen vegetarians/vegans, they are malnourished, there's no two ways about it. Same thing with people who eat WAY too much protein (who were not raised this way), they have all sorts of issues eventually.

Vegans CAN have healthy diets to live on. But it usually involves a lot of work, supplements are common. I personally feel that a human is a natural omnivore. All the scientific issues point towards our being such.

There are people who eat a full meat diet, and they survive quite well. The Inuit are one such people, and they used to eat a extremely heavy meat diet. The ancient Mogolians also ate(the modern day Mongols also)a very heavy diet of animal products, mainly milk, cheese and side products from such in addition to lots of meat. They did eat some grains and herbs, but mostly meat and milk products. Both cultures survive quite well. Now, both are living in extreme cold as well, but they do survive without dying from not being vegetarians.

Most of the vegans I meet/see do not look healthy. I know that healthy vegans DO exist, but so do healthy carnivore people. I'm quite happy for anyone who wishes to be a vegan or vegetarian to eat however they like.. just don't try to force me to eat that way. I'll have a dead critter on my plate.

And people teeth are only superficially similiar to horse teeth. With that, you could say people teeth are alike to any creature's teeth. Since chimpanzees(which many AR people are fond of touting as "nearly human" in genetics) hunt and eat meat in the wild as a matter of course, that's just more evidence that humans are indeed on the correct track as omnivores. Are we more advanced? Sure we are. Should being more advanced mean we stop eating meat? No, not any more than being advanced means we should sit in the sun and absorb all our vitamins from strictly sunshine.

Call Me T-Rex Cause I'm A Carnivore.


It's not "merciful" or "enlightened" to be a Vegetarian or God forbid a Vegan. Infact it can cause alot of health problems. Our bodies are made to eat a variety of food.


Besides how can you live with yourself you TOMATO MURDERER!! All those poor Cherries and Peanuts you killed. They Had Stems and Roots That Cared about them. Your so heartless. DO THERE LIVES MEAN SO LITTLE TO YOU! :tears::tears:


When, oh When, Will man and Vegetable Coexist in PEACE!!



P.S. For anyone who was offended by that stop doing the other one to people who eat meat. All of you probably don't but I have heard my fair share.

It reminds me of a comedian who said something very true. If a vegetarian Comes over to your house they expect a vegetarian meal Even if they know your grilling steaks. But if you come over do they ever make you a chicken breast or some fried shrimp? Noooooooooo. It's A chance to convert you with Tofurkey. :shudder:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dc1

Im a red blooded conservative, what can I say :rofl:

---

What you said doesn't really make you a conservative, more prejudiced than anything.

This is my research paper that I wrote for my English class on vegetarianism. I cut out about half of it that isn't relevant here. The parts I took out were on animal overpopulation, the environment, and (or lack thereof) cruelty in slaughterhouses. This is also a rough draft because the final one is saved on a different computer that I don't have with me right now. Here goes!

Meat contains valuable nutrients, some of which can be difficult to find in vegetables and grains. Deficiency of the vitamin B12 is quite common in vegetarians, and it can result in seizures, neurological, degeneration, and possibly death (Willet). According to nutritionists, trimmed beef contains iron, zinc, B12, and plenty of protein (National Cattlemen’s Beef Association “Livestock Agriculture Does Not Harm the Environment”). Although protein is obtainable in non-meat such as peanuts, it is more abundant in beef. Vegetarian diets not only can cause deficiencies, they also put adults (especially pregnant and lactating women) at a higher risk for anemia and children at risk for rickets and slowed growth (National Cattlemen’s Beef Association “Livestock Agriculture Does Not Harm the Environment”). Recently, a New York couple was arrested for child abuse of their 16 month old child because the vegan diet they imposed on their baby stunted its growth to half of its healthy size (Avery).

Children who do attempt a vegetarian diet usually will eat more simple carbohydrates such as doughnuts, sugar, and fatty foods as opposed to vegetables (“To meat or not to meat: is vegetarianism healthy for teens? (DEBATE)). Many vegetarians are children or teenagers, and they are more likely to omit the proper supplements and to overindulge in chips and breads. According to the California Department of Public Health, deficiencies are more likely to surface in teenagers who practice a vegan or vegetarian diet (qtd. In “To meat or not to meat: is vegetarianism healthy for teens? (DEBATE)). Although vegetarianism is thought to be a relatively healthy practice, Dr. Christopher Boiling, director of weight management research at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, would disagree: “Vegetarianism doesn’t mean low calorie” (qtd. in “To meat or not to meat: is vegetarianism healthy for teens? (DEBATE)). Some go vegetarian because it is thought that meat causes weight gain. According to the American Dietetic Association, American Heart Association, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institution, 5-7 oz. of lean trimmed meat daily should be eaten for a healthy diet (National Cattlemen’s Beef Association “Livestock Agriculture Does Not Harm the Environment”).

Dieticians generally recommend that vegetarians take supplements in order to maintain a healthy diet, but taking supplements can be a dangerous game. If vitamin A is taken for a long period of time in large amounts, it can cause liver damage and birth defects in pregnant women. If too much B6 is taken, it can impair the nervous system function. Diabetes and diarrhea can occur if a large amount of vitamin C is ingested. In fact, vegetarians don’t know for sure that the vitamin and mineral supplements being taken contribute to health; they are not required to be tested or certified (Kava). You have to be very exact in the type and amount to even be taking. According to the US Department of Agriculture, 40% of the poultry sold in the US has the bacteria salmonella on it (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals “The Case for Vegetarianism”). Although this is true, salmonella, E. coli, and other bacteria are found on all foods, not just meat (Kopperud). Vegetarianism is not the healthiest diet, and meat is necessary for a thriving lifestyle.

Some vegetarians argue that humans are not meant to eat meat and that it is not how our bodies were designed. However, herbivores have complex or multiple stomachs and intestinal tracts, while humans have relatively short intestinal tracts and one stomach (“Human Consumption of Animals is Not Immoral”). Humans have canine teeth designed for biting and tearing into meat, but herbivorous animals have only their molars for grinding up plants (“Human Consumption of Animals is Not Immoral”). Both facts illustrate that humans are made to eat both meat and plants because we have the digestive ability of both carnivorous and herbivorous animals. Many people have heard of the appendix, but few are aware of what it was originally meant to do. The appendix, in humans, is useless, but in herbivores, it is a bacteria-filled pouch next to the intestines that breaks down plant cells into digestible food stuffs (“Human Consumption of Animals is Not Immoral”). Because humans no longer need the appendix, we no longer “need” to eat plants.

Another case often made by vegetarians is that humans’ relatives, the various primates, are herbivorous. However, this is untrue. Gorillas kept in captivity have been observed eating meat when offered it. Not only have gorillas have been seen eating meat; other primates are omnivorous. The bonobo and chimpanzee include mammals and monkeys in their diet. Humans were designed to eat animals because people and living things have a symbiotic relationship; we rely on one another for sustainment. Dr. Temple Grandin, a renowned animal scientist and inventor of a restraint system used in slaughterhouses, compares humans and livestock to ants and aphids: The aphids are raised by ants as sort of dairy cows and are fed by the ants, and, in return, the aphids produce a sugary substance for the ants. This sort of relationship is found often in nature, and it exists between us and animals (Grandin).

there is a word for herbivores :rolleyes: i think its "prey"

I'm glad you took my advice and made a new thread for this instead of continuing on the other. I wrote a big long reply for you this afternoon but I forgot my laptop, so I'll post it later tomorrow when I get home from work.

I don't know guys, after all aren't be called human beans? Maybe we are Herbovores.;););)

Jim Smith

On the subject of human teeth vs horse teeth:

Horses will happily snarf down hot dogs and other forms of meat.

There are in fact many instances of non-predator 'herbivores' having been observed in the wild eating meat that they scavanged.

Hippos in particular come to mind.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion

Since one of our fellow BPers has made the statement that humans are herbivores, and I refuted that with references to a great deal of evidence to the contrary, rather than hijacking the Bullfighting thread, I figured I would go ahead and give it its own arena.

---

You would be referring to me, but you are misinterpreting what I said. I didn't say that humans were herbivores- I said we were originally herbivores. Clearly we have adapted to ability to digest meat, but I seriously doubt that our original ancestors were meat eaters.

Quote:

---

So:
Evidence for omnivory in humans:
Dentition: Cutting surfaces and grinding surfaces evenly arranged. Molars are weak, not up to the task of grinding large amounts of plant matter. Canines are small, but canines are used for grasping prey, not for cutting meat, so are not necessary for an animal that does not kill using its teeth. Number of teeth reduced in modern humans. Jaw size also reduced, indicating a diet that is not high in fibrous or tough materials. Jaw PRESSURE in modern humans is quite impressive, however. We can crack a nut (or a bone) if we have to. In a fossil record, modern humans would be easily identified as omnivores.

---

Actually there is really nothing about our dentition that suggests it evolved for the purposes of eating meat. You suggest that it does because we could be capable of crushing bone, how that just isn't really true. Our jaw strength is not really that impressive at all, and certainly paltry in comparison to predators who use their teeth for crushing bones. We would have a tough time with nuts, really. A diet that requires lots of bone crunching would leave us with broken teeth at a very young age.

Here is something that I’m sure I will repeat several times before I’m done:

Humans are clearly not ruminants. You are correct that we are not grazers and don’t have the teeth of a cow, nor do we have multiple stomachs for the digestion of tough plant matter. However, we are well designed to eat soft vegetation and we lack pretty much every adaptation of carnivorous and omnivorous animals (compare our jaws and dentition to that of other omnivores such as bears and pigs).

We have no teeth that aid in ripping meat from bone as omnivores and carnivores do. Our canines are so small as to be rendered useless. The shape of our jaw is all wrong for eating meat as well. Our jaws are designed for chewing and grinding- the configuration of our mandibular joints are much more complex and less stable than that of a carnivore. Instead of a simple joint which allows the jaws to scissor together (couple with large, sharp teeth designed to cut meat), humans have a complex jaw which brings dull, flat teeth together in a single plane so that all teeth meet at once for grinding and chewing. Our jaws also move side to side to aid in this grinding motion, just like other herbivores.

The shape of our oral cavity also suggests that meat is not a major dietary item. If you walked up to a deer you would have a very difficult time getting any meat from it. Our oral cavities are very small and not pronounced as they would be in animals designed to eat me (even compare us to the omnivorous pig). You could get your mouth around a leg or something, but you would find it very difficult to take a nice big bite out of the abdomen, unlike, say, a wolf or hyena or alligator.

Jaw size is reduced, but this is related to the fact that it allows us more room for a larger brain. This likely did happen after we started eating meat (and had the fat intake necessary to grow such a large brain). The fact that we have to get our wisdom teeth removed is evidence that we once had jaws that were more capable of handling fibrous matter. Not all evolutionary changes are advantageous (for example, humans have a much more difficult time giving birth than most other animals because our upright position requires a narrower pelvis, which makes birthing more difficult).

Quote:

---

Intestinal length: Herbivores use one of two strategies to enable them to digest plant matter--either an extremely long and elaborate digestive system (such as in a cow), or a shorter system that food is passed through more than one time (such as in a rabbit). Carnivores have a short digestive tract, because meat is high in nutrients and extremely simple to digest. Omnivores have a digestive tract that is intermediate between the two. In fact, the human digestive tract is closely comparable in length and structure to that of a pig--a devout omnivore.

---

You are comparing our digestive tract to that of a ruminant, which again humans clearly are not. You would like to compare our digestive tract to that of a pig, but it is erroneous to just pick one other animal to compare us to.
Take a bear for example. It is an omnivore, with the majority of its diet composed of soft vegetation. It does also eat meat, though, and because of that it has classic anatomical features of carnivores including a short gut length (about 5x its body length, as opposed to humans’ 12x) and jaws designed for eating meat (as well as the teeth, claws, and sheer brute strength to hunt)

Quote:

---

Tools: Hominids and great apes are devout tool users. Tool use itself is an interesting adaptation that allows a species to take advantage of a variety of food resources. Some species rely on tool use almost exclusively in order to procure food, such as woodpecker finches. Great apes regularly use tools to procure their food--to crack nuts, for example, to fish for termites, and to kill small animal prey. Our closest living relatives, bonobos and chimpanzees, both kill and eat monkeys fairly regularly to supplement their diets. Female orangutans have also been observed catching and eating small animal prey, and fish. The oldest stone tools we have found created by homonids were clearly designed for pounding, cutting, and scraping. Cutting and scraping are needed for preparing meat, and not for much else. Throughout the progression of homonid tool development, we find increasingly sophisticated tools for preparing meat and hides, and for hunting (such as spearheads).

---

Saying that great apes a ‘devout tool users’ is a bit misleading. Great apes occasionally use tools, and they rarely use them to kill other animals. Mostly they’ll use sticks to retrieve termites and rocks to break open nuts. This is nowhere near the complexity of a bow and arrow or hunting spear. Also, humans are not descendents of great apes. We share common ancestry, but we had an evolution divergence many many years ago. We are separate species with separate diets. It is clear that great apes have evolved adaptations that make it easier for them to eat meat (their canines are much larger than ours, for example).

Cutting, pounding, and scraping are also things used to break down tough plant matter before consumption. Civilizations evolved meat-eating ways. Preparing meat and hides has nothing to do with our diets, but the fact that we had to develop complex tools used to kill animals suggests that it is not an original adaptation.

Quote:

---

Behavior: Humans hunt. Even children, left to their own devices, will stalk small animals. Catching butterflies isn't just about the 'pretty'. We have all the instinctive equipment necessary to wait patiently for long periods, to track, and to persist. We enjoy the process of hunting, like all predators.

---

Herbivorous animals such as rabbits, horses, apes, etc also frolick and play with one another, particularly as juveniles. They chase and pounce as well. It is a way for them to establish dominance within a group and learn how to interact with members of their group, not necessarily a way to practice hunting.

Quote:

---

Physical fitness: Although you wouldn't know it by looking at the average cubicle-dweller, humans are incredible athletes. We are not particularly fast, but we don't have to be fast--we have tremendous endurance, and we can run for miles. Many prey species cannot. As a result, one of the oldest methods of hunting is known as persistance hunting. It involves selecting a large, fit male of a horned animal species, and following it until it drops dead of heat prostration and exhaustion. (The heavy horns tax the animal's strength faster). This is not a rare occurrence, or luck--it is a regular hunting style still practiced by the San people in Africa today. The San are our genetic ancestors, according to gene mapping...they are the oldest surviving lineage of humans on the planet. Humans can climb, dig, swim, jump, and run for miles without stopping. We are superb predators and are capable of grasping any opportunity presented to us.

---

Many carnivores and omnivores alike have high endurance for a variety of reasons.

I disagree wholeheartedly that humans are ‘superb predators.’ Aside from our intelligence, we are not well designed for tracking. The fact that we walk on two feet greatly reduces our stealth. As you've pointed out, we aren't all that fast, either. We have very poor senses of hearing, smell, and vision when compared to the rest of the animal world. We have nothing aside from tools to help us kill an animal, and we have very poor anatomical defenses for our own bodies. We wouldn't do well in a fight with a prey animal.

We can climb, sure, but we aren’t that good at it really. You could probably make it up an apple tree to pick some fruit, but if you are going to be battling some animal up there so that you can overpower it and eat it you’re likely to be quite disappointed.

Quote:

---

Culture: The oldest existing human cultures on Earth are omnivorous. In fact, there are no primitive herbivorous cultures. There are primitive carnivorous cultures, however (the Inuit, for example).

---

Evolutionarily speaking, even Inuits are modern cultures. It is true that there are some cultures that could not survive without meat. However, these cultures did not evolve in the areas where they now live, suggesting that the meat eating was an adaptation and not an original intent.

Quote:

---

Nutrition: Humans require vitamin B-12 in their diet, which is a vitamin that herbivores manufacture in their own gut. B-12 is found primarily in meat. B-12 is a very important vitamin for human health. Non-animal sources of B-12 are few and far between, and were largely or entirely unavailable to primitive peoples (such as yeast). No successful herbivore is unable to manufacture vitamin B-12 for itself.

---

The human demand for B-12 is very low and readily available through sources that early humans almost certainly ate; insects and eggs (argue that eating insects make us omnivorous if you want- I won't disagree. But I think it's pretty clear we're talking about eating higher members of the animal kingdom). A well balanced vegetarian (though not vegan) diet provides adequate amounts of B-12 (and all other necessary dietary vitamins and minerals)

Quote:

---

Other various adaptation (such as digestive fluids and saliva):
As has been pointed out, meat is easy to digest. Vegetable food sources are difficult to digest, so most herbivores will concentrate their efforts on making the vegetation they find palatable actually digestible. It's much harder to digest a leaf than it is to digest a mouse, so more changes are needed to enable the digestion of plant matter.

This is the flaw of omnivory:
You can eat many things, but you will not be perfect at eating any of them. Humans are poorly adapted to eating both meat AND plant matter, but they are supremely adaptable because they can derive proper nutrition from eating both.

---

You are putting the cart before the horse a bit here. It is more likely that animals evolved senses of smell and taste to make what is digestible also palatable and not the other way around. We probably were able to digest berries before we found them delicious. The fact that we have a highly developed sense of taste is further evidence that we are well-evolved plant eaters, as carnivores lack well developed taste buds.

Humans are not poorly adapted to eating plant matter. We are not designed to eat things like corn and grass, but we are very well designed to digest succulents such as fruits and vegetables. We are so finely tuned for this purpose that we have a well developed sense of taste that makes us find the sweet sugars in these plants highly palatable when raw. The anthropological evidence from early cultures shows the use of cook fires used to prepare meat to make it palatable, suggesting that humans do not naturally find raw meat appealing. This was lucky for them, really, because their bodies are very poorly adapted to consume meat, particularly raw. We are highly susceptible to disease and parasites that are often spread through undercooked meat. Carnivores and omnivores are far less susceptible to this problem. Consider your omnivorous pig who will happily eat a carcass it happens across in the woods. Eating spoiled meat causes severe illness in a poorly-adapted human.
Digestive fluids and saliva are good things to point out, but neither in a human suggest that we are designed to eat meat, actually. Meat eaters do not have saliva that has digestive enzymes to help with predigestion of plant matter, whereas herbivores (and humans) do. Also, our stomach acids are considerably weaker than a carnivore’s, as are herbivores.

Recent research is also beginning to unlock the secret of our ‘useless’ appendix. Many herbivores have much larger appendixes which are useful in digesting plant matter. Our appendixes are shrunken and we survive just fine without them, but the evidence suggests that they are vestigial organs which once had a purpose when we were herbivores but not are losing their usefulness and evolving away.



All evidence I have seen points to an evolutionary pattern of herbivore to omnivore. Early humans were well adapted to eat plant material. As our brains grew and we evolved socially we developed tools that we were able to use to kill and consume animals. We discovered fire that made eating meat not only palatable, but also finally safe. The ability to eat meat allowed us to migrate to other areas of the world and survive in harsher climates and to flourish and continue our evolution. Our brains grew bigger, we had to put less effort into foraging, and we were able to put away fat stores for lean times so we didn’t have to hibernate or decrease our activity when food was scarce. We had the tools available to us so we had no need to evolved physical adaptations like other omnivores. We relied less on plant material so our bodies began to do away with unnecessary anatomy (reducing the appendix and shortening the gut somewhat) just like an eyeless cave fish did away with its vision.
While we clearly are able to eat meat in small quantities without ill effects (and even with some benefit, provided it’s the right meat), I see no evidence that suggests that early humans were built for hunting or consuming meat but rather quite a bit of evidence that humans evolved the ability later in their evolutionary history.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by unspecified42

You would be referring to me, but you are misinterpreting what I said. I didn't say that humans were herbivores- I said we were originally herbivores. Clearly we have adapted to ability to digest meat, but I seriously doubt that our original ancestors were meat eaters.

---

Why were we originally herbivores? How does that even make sense? Archaeologists and anthropologists have researched the topic for hundreds of years, and it's clear that we ate meat. Archaeologists have found spears and other weapons used for hunting. What's your explanation for that?

Not all vegans and vegetarians are unhealthy. It is quite possible to be vegan and eat a horrible diet just like the guy sitting in a McDonalds. I can honestly say that I was one of these vegans.

The first time I tried going vegan, I did it all wrong. The majority of my diet was made up of highly processed foods and rice. I drank a lot of soda and sugary juices, and I hardly ate fresh foods. Even on this horrible diet, I still felt better than I had on an omnivorous diet. (dairy and meat make me feel like crap) I lasted 3 months on this diet and eventually went to a vegetarian diet for 2 years.

A healthy vegetarian or vegan diet is high in fresh fruits and vegetables, not processed meat substitutes and junk food (like many teen veg*ns eat).

The one thing I have against an omnivorous diet is that plant matter is made to digest slowly, which our body has no trouble with, given we are eating plenty of fruits and vegetables and not corn and other grains. Meat is to be digested quickly. Its like your in traffic. The meat is a nice fast, sports car. You want to get to your destination fast but you are stuck behind some old ladies in a van. The meat gets blocked behind this slow moving plant matter and eventually will start rotting in your gut. (I believe this is why some people feel sluggish after eating meat, like I do)

On the note about teeth. Our teeth are not designed to eat rough vegetation like grasses and grains. Rather they are better suited to eating fruits and vegetables (which do not require the amount of grinding that rough vegetation does). The canines that many people associate with eating meat might be better suited to tearing off the rinds and skins of certain plants. If you look at any carnivore, their back teeth are not flat in the slightest. They are raised and sharp, meant for cutting meat from a carcass. I watch it all the time with my dog, cats, and ferrets. They use their canines to catch or drag their prey and use the back sharp teeth to cut meat from the bone and swallow the chunks whole. (This is also why dogs tend to gulp their food. They are supposed to eat like that. Their digestive systems are meant to break down meat with little help from the teeth). And our teeth could more than easily crunch through the bones of small animals like lizards, most birds, fish, and small mammals, but I could not crack through a rib bone. My dog on the other hand goes through a raw rib like no tomorrow.


Now, I believe we are omnivores to a degree, but I also believe we have a choice. If done correctly a person could easily thrive on a vegan diet or even an all meat diet, given they do it correctly. Get enough variety in your diet (even obligate carnivores need variety in their diet. Certain meats are higher or lower in certain nutrients), and watch your food intake (don't eat too little or too much).

I'm not sure if what you're trying to say here is that our remote primate ancestors were herbivores...if so, you do realize that's irrelevant? (As well as unsupported). Dietary adaptation can change in just one step on the family tree--from one species to the next.

Homo neanderthalus was a CARNIVORE. Analysis of fossil dung found in neanderthal areas shows that they had the digestive enzymes of a carnivore. They were physiologically adapted to a diet of almost exclusively meat. These guys are our close cousins (kissing cousins, even, according to some theories).

They came down the same evolutionary branch we did, they're VERY close to us. They had sophisticated tools, they had religion, fire, and culture. They were exceptionally intelligent...just not very creative, alas.

Now, it is understood that Homonids evolved from a lemur-like ancestor. Lemurs eat a variety of fruits, shoots, roots, insects, eggs, and small animals (including lizards, frogs, small rodents, and birds). So, right at the base of our tree, we have a primate omnivore.

Most primates are omnivores, you know. I hate to break it to you, but insects are animals. They are not plants. They do count. Eggs are also animal matter. The difference between eating a mouse or lizard, and eating a deer, is one of degree, not type.

Rabbits will play and tussle with each other. They do not spend 4 hours stalking butterflies by themselves. Human children do this. I know this, because I was one once, and I have 2 of them.

Homo sapiens is unquestionably an omnivore--are you disagreeing with that? If you do not disagree with that, then what relevance is there in saying that SOME of the ancestors of this species were herbivores? It's surely true, but some may have been carnivores like neanderthal, and many (probably most) were clearly omnivores.

You mistake the enlarged canines of our relatives, the great apes, for weapons used to procure or eat meat. They are for display and inter-personal combat, not for hunting. Hippos are herbivores...have you seen the teeth on those things?

Gorillas eat scant little animal matter, and their canines are very pronounced. Chimps eat plenty, including monkeys--they kill them by beating them to death with their hands, they don't kill them with their teeth.
Bears are physiologically more like carnivores than anything else, yet they are omnivores in practice. It's now been discovered that some species of fanged deer (the Muntjac is a commonly known species) actually hunt down and eat small animals, lol.

Chimpanzee molars are more impressive than ours, by the way--they're better suited for grinding shoots and leaves and plant matter. Yet they are omnivores.
Chimps are Homonids. I know, it hasn't made the front page of the Times just yet, but it will. Genetic studies and fossil records finally made it clear that our closest relatives are on the SAME BRANCH of the family tree that we're on...they diverged from the Homonid line, not from the line the split off prior to the Homonids. They're really another type of 'man', not another type of 'ape'....so to speak. Or, we are all the same type of ape...

Pigs are are good example of an omnivore, and they're useful as a comparison with humans because they are actually physiologically very similar to humans. Bears are not very similar to humans.

As for dentition...it tells us a lot less than we would like to think it does.

Neanderthal skull: http://museumstorecompany.com/images/285.jpg
Remember. Neanderthals were carnivores.

It appears than when diet changes, the intestinal tract changes first--the acids it produces, and how it functions, are the first to adapt to new food sources via evolution. More impressive morphological changes in bone change later...and they only change if they HAVE TO. Selective pressure is responsible for these changes, and for tool using animals, the change becomes unnecessary, so it will never happen. Humans don't have large canines because we have no use for them. We don't display using our teeth that way, we don't defend ourselves or fight with them, and we don't hunt with them. No matter what we eat, we will never need large canines. We can digest meat, and plant matter...and we don't need to do better than we do now, because we can process and cook our food. And our primitive homonid ancestors could, too.

We will never need shearing teeth, because we have knives. We will never need grinding molars--we can chop our food, and cook it. Our ancestors didn't need them, either...for those exact reasons. Their tools may have been primitive, but they eliminated the need for radical changes in dentition to follow changes in diet. We're learning that teeth are adapted to deal with worst-case scenarios. An ancestor with huge grinding choppers may have eaten primarily soft foods...but if it had to, it could handle the rough stuff, to get it through lean times. We see examples of this alive in the world today in other species.

Woodpecker finches will never develop the long, brush-like tongue of a woodpecker, because they have solved their problem through tool use...and they no longer need a long tongue.

Humans, weak jaws? We can exert 120 to 160 PSI of pressure!
We can bite just as hard, proportionally, as a chimpanzee-or the huge-jawed 'nutcracker man' in the homonid family tree.
Why? Because we are more efficient biters than either of them. Our jaw strength is deceptive. Our skulls can be lighter, as a result of higher efficiency.

http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20102206-21081.html

In conclusion, our jaws and teeth, as they are today, are great for cracking open nuts or small bones, but they're not good for grinding up coarse plant matter (such as what gorillas eat). Sustained chewing is not our forte.

We have STRONG chompers, though.

Tell me, where is the evidence that any homonid was ever truly an herbivore? We already know that lemurs are omnivores.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion

I'm not sure if what you're trying to say here is that our remote primate ancestors were herbivores...if so, you do realize that's irrelevant?

---

lol. On the other thread where I suggested you start this thread I said that very thing, actually. You must not have read the whole thing;) That's why I didn't continue on that thread or make another, nor am I continuing on this one. (although I will point out that hyenas, snapping turtles, and alligators all produce over a 1,000 PSI, to name a few. It's all relative!)

I am personally a responsible omnivore. I eat no meat that I did not provide for myself (by hunting or the rabbits and chickens I raise). I have a big problem with not only how much meat the average American thinks they need to eat and where they get it. Their health and the health of the country is in serious risk.

*meh*

I just wish people that ate meat would call themselves omnivores, and not give themselves those pesky qualifiers (Pollo, pesco(?), etc.). If you eat meat you are not a vegetarian.

Drives me bonkers as an ex vegan. The day I started re-consuming milk and eggs (animal proteins) I was no longer a vegetarian, let alone a vegan.

Bruce

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bruce Whitehead

*meh*

I just wish people that ate meat would call themselves omnivores, and not give themselves those pesky qualifiers (Pollo, pesco(?), etc.). If you eat meat you are not a vegetarian.

Drives me bonkers as an ex vegan. The day I started re-consuming milk and eggs (animal proteins) I was no longer a vegetarian, let alone a vegan.

Bruce

---

People call themselves ovo-, lacto-, or ovo-lacto- vegetarians to signify whether they consume milk or eggs. 'Vegetarian' does not mean that the individual doesn't eat animal proteins, it means that they don't eat meat. If you eat milk and eggs but not meat you are a vegetarian by anyone's standards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bruce Whitehead

*meh*

I just wish people that ate meat would call themselves omnivores, and not give themselves those pesky qualifiers (Pollo, pesco(?), etc.). If you eat meat you are not a vegetarian.

Drives me bonkers as an ex vegan. The day I started re-consuming milk and eggs (animal proteins) I was no longer a vegetarian, let alone a vegan.

Bruce

---

It makes it easier for the people around you though, if they're trying to serve you something. I think the terms do have a place for the sake of convenience, even if the people are technically are omnivores.

Maybe it's Omnitarian. (vegetarian, etc...? lol...)

But I don't think there's any evidence that any direct homonid ancestor was herbivorous. Of course, we can't really be 100% sure WHAT they ate in most cases (due to the aforementioned issues with teeth not always matching diet). Still, the beginning (lemur-like primates) and the end (H.sapiens) were omnivores.

Where food comes from IS important...unfortunately, if you're not in a higher tax bracket, you probably don't have as much option to select the best as you would like. Instead, you have to go with the best you can get that's affordable...and that's not very good these days.
I'm gonna go pick some organic tomatoes from my garden, now. ;D (Then they're going to be paired with some cheap chopped ham lunch meat and mayonnaise on bread, yum).

I'll eat just about anything placed in front of me. Particularly when somebody else is paying for it!

And yes, that includes my favorite pizza with jalepeno peppers and anchovies! Heaven...

Personally, this kind of discussion gets a little old to me. People will eat what they'll eat. I highly doubt that you will ever get the world to be completely vegetarian, but it's also nobody's business if someone doesn't want to eat whatever kind of meat. I suppose it's really not my place to say anything more xD I love food, and I simply prefer stuff that's been grown/raised around where I live, meat or plant matter. Don't really care what people decide they want to eat, and if they want to judge me on what I eat it's their decision

I eat things cooked medium. Rawrr.

If we were herbivores we would be better able to break down plant fibers such as cellulose.
And I agree with Valentine pirate. This discussion is completely irrelevant. There's plenty of evidence to show how we came about, and it kind of frustrates me that this topic came about because of someone trying to push their views on the world via the interwebs. But I guess that's what they were made for... that and lolcats.

Yes, but when have you ever seen a omnivore type person INSISTING that a vegan eat meat? Even when we believe that they are unhealthy by eating vegan, no one is trying to force them to eat meat. No picketing outside vegan stores with pictures of juicy burgers.

It's always seemed so one-way to me, that vegans feel it's fine to rant and rave at me about what I choose to eat, while they are never harassed about what they eat. And not talking about people in this thread, more about people in Real Life, outside the internets. Some vegans see nothing wrong with stopping at a stranger's table to fuss about the nice big steak or rack of lamb(had it happen multiple times, and friends have had the same thing happen to them).

.fail.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wolfy-hound

Yes, but when have you ever seen a omnivore type person INSISTING that a vegan eat meat? Even when we believe that they are unhealthy by eating vegan, no one is trying to force them to eat meat. No picketing outside vegan stores with pictures of juicy burgers.

It's always seemed so one-way to me, that vegans feel it's fine to rant and rave at me about what I choose to eat, while they are never harassed about what they eat. And not talking about people in this thread, more about people in Real Life, outside the internets. Some vegans see nothing wrong with stopping at a stranger's table to fuss about the nice big steak or rack of lamb(had it happen multiple times, and friends have had the same thing happen to them).

---

just gonna add some stuff that I thought was pretty common sense...

Besides all of that insisting... Why would you think that being a vegan, OR vegetarian would be unhealthy???

You know that all nutrients are passed down from the food chain right? We learned that stuff in like 6th grade. "Non meat" foods are packed with nutrients, and meat only gets them from being passed down, and every time its passed down the ammount is lessened.

Im not saying its OK to rant and rave about you eating meat, do what you want, but i would prefer to be a vegetarian because I dont think its right to needlessly slaughter animals so we can eat meat, when as said before, we can adapt to being vegetarians. Maybe Im weird, being an animal lover and all...

I still eat meat, unfortunatley, even though sometimes I cant stand it and think it is discusting, I have to because I cant make all of my own meals, and my parents always make meat, about 99% of the time, and theyre not going to buy me food to make vegetarian meals with.

And on a side note, they shouldnt be harassed for what they eat because they are not killing animals. Im pretty sure thats what most of it is about. Ever seen the slaughter house videos? Maybe you will see WHY they are against eating meat.....

Steak and avocados are my two favorite foods. Me = Omnivore. LOL. If I could raise my own cattle I would. But since I live in a suburb I can't really have cattle grazing in my front yard can I. So in all reality I get meat from a grocery story. I try to buy organic or free range products when possible but they're not always available.

I've been inside real slaughterhouses. Have you? I've killed a critter, butchered and eaten it.

Why is it that you say you're an animal lover as if I can't be one, just because I eat meat? How can you feed your pet other animals, if you don't want to support killing animals? It's okay, because the snake/dog/cat/critter is "designed" to eat meat? So are people.

I've said before, many vegans and vegetarians DON'T eat a healthy diet. Yes, it can be done, but you can't simply eat taters and carrots and think you'll do well. It's a very balanced deal to get all your nutrient from vegetables, rather than eating meat. Did you even read about certain nutrients that are only found in a few items, meat being one of them?

If a vegan is going to harass me over MY choices, why can't I harass them over THEIR choices? What about all the critters killed in the vegetable/grain fields? More vegetarian food crops being raised would mean more animals killed in those fields.. but that's okay, because it's not big like a cow.

Considering the amount of crap in our diets nowadays, I'm inclined to say that humans are detrivores. :P ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I<3Dreamsicles

You know that all nutrients are passed down from the food chain right? We learned that stuff in like 6th grade. "Non meat" foods are packed with nutrients, and meat only gets them from being passed down, and every time its passed down the ammount is lessened.

---

Logic fail.

Nutrients are CONCENTRATED in animal foods...not 'lessened'. This is why carnivores have such short intestinal tracts. Meat is easy to break down and very high in nutrients. Entire cultures have thrived on diets consisting almost exclusively of animal matter.

Cow eats acres upon acres of grass. Nutrients in grass are used by and concentrated in the cow. We eat the cow, we get the nutrients from acres of grass. (Sort of--that's pretty simplified).
This works out particularly well for us, since we can't digest grass.

I also have no problem with slaughtering and processing an animal for meat. Doesn't bother me. In fact, I cannot look at a cow without thinking of a ribeye, lol. I love animals--all of them. I think they're beautiful, amazing, and endlessly fascinating. I also think that we're part of the food chain, and many arguments for vegetarianism are deeply flawed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion

Cow eats acres upon acres of grass. Nutrients in grass are used by and concentrated in the cow. We eat the cow, we get the nutrients from acres of grass. (Sort of--that's pretty simplified).
This works out particularly well for us, since we can't digest grass.

---

In order to maintain weight and stay healthy, a goat needs to eat a minimum of 20% of his or her body weight. I imagine it's the same for cattle. It is correct that we can't break down certain plant matter due to lacking the bacteria required to break it down (hence why you'll find pieces of corn in the toilet lol). This bacteria requires a certain PH level to survive. To acidic/alkaline and it'll die. Our intestines simple don't have the proper environment. Which is why this bacteria is only found in ruminant animals.