Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 654

2 members and 652 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,197
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer

Terry Cullen raided

Printable View

  • 06-08-2010, 05:47 PM
    Kaorte
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anthonym View Post
    Huh...? What are you talking about?

    Has nothing to do with agreeing/disagreeing with me. I never even stated my thoughts on this topic. I'm talking about all the speculation on both sides of the argument.

    This entire discussion in general is nothing but heresy and speculation on both sides at this point. Even though no one on either side has any proof about anything. Its getting old.

    So what? If its getting old then don't read the thread. No one is holding a knife to your throat. :confused:
  • 06-08-2010, 05:52 PM
    anthonym
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Kaorte View Post
    So what? If its getting old then don't read the thread. No one is holding a knife to your throat. :confused:

    So.. are you arguing that it would be more productive to just keep speculating back and forth on the matter?

    You were also just asking for someone to provide proof and stop speculating just a few posts ago. I think we are on the same side.. :confused:
  • 06-08-2010, 05:58 PM
    Kaorte
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anthonym View Post
    So.. are you arguing that it would be more productive to just keep speculating back and forth on the matter?

    You were also just asking for someone to provide proof and stop speculating just a few posts ago. I think we are on the same side.. :confused:

    It doesn't matter. I am not just going to stop talking about it because YOU want me to because "speculating" is annoying to YOU. I happen to like speculating.

    As for what I was asking, I was asking Joe to provide me another source from where those pictures could have been procured since he seems to think it is so easy to just fake that kind of stuff.
  • 06-08-2010, 06:10 PM
    Foschi Exotic Serpents
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    I'm holding all of you in contempt! Bailiff! Take em away! :bonk: :rolleye2:
  • 06-08-2010, 06:17 PM
    anthonym
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by wilomn View Post
    Joe, your loyalty is admirable.

    However, you have no more facts than anyone else. Instead of constantly fanning the flames, which only serves to keep this foremost in the minds of many, why not get some FACTS?

    Those might be pictures from his place. The fact is, YOU don't know if they are or not. Maybe, instead of just yelling about how it MIGHT be fake, you do some fact finding?

    Seriously Joe, I know you don't care, but you're looking like someone stuck in denial.

    Give that some thought.

    This quote from wilomn is pretty much the same thing I am saying.. so why are you guys getting defensive when I say that speculation is bad, and we need actual facts. But when someone else says it, its totally accepted.. I'm confused here..
  • 06-08-2010, 06:23 PM
    Kaorte
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anthonym View Post
    This quote from wilomn is pretty much the same thing I am saying.. so why are you guys getting defensive when I say that speculation is bad, and we need actual facts. But when someone else says it, its totally accepted.. I'm confused here..

    no, you said this topic should be locked and not discussed at all.
  • 06-08-2010, 06:30 PM
    anthonym
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Kaorte View Post
    no, you said this topic should be locked and not discussed at all.

    I said I WISHED it would be locked and that people would stop speculating. Sorry for expressing my opinion about it. Why are you getting so defensive about it? Have I insulted you in some way? If I have I apologize Kaorte.
  • 06-08-2010, 06:34 PM
    Kaorte
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anthonym View Post
    I said I WISHED it would be locked and that people would stop speculating. Sorry for expressing my opinion about it. Why are you getting so defensive about it? Have I insulted you in some way? If I have I apologize Kaorte.

    Nah I am not insulted. I just don't see the point of wanting a thread locked because you don't like what is being discussed when you can simply not look at it. The content is not breaking the rules so why lock it or delete it? Another thread will just be made.

    I like this thread. I like the updates and I like the conversation, whether it be speculation or fact.
  • 06-08-2010, 06:49 PM
    anthonym
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Kaorte View Post
    Nah I am not insulted. I just don't see the point of wanting a thread locked because you don't like what is being discussed when you can simply not look at it. The content is not breaking the rules so why lock it or delete it? Another thread will just be made.

    I like this thread. I like the updates and I like the conversation, whether it be speculation or fact.

    The point was more so that by speculating we are starting to spread mis-information and non factual data which is never a good thing. I think the guy is a piece of crap at this point. But that's besides the point. Inversely, if thats how you feel about my post, you could have just ignored it as well. But like me, you chose not to, and to voice your opinion as well. :)

    I see nothing wrong with discussing the topic. It's very relevant to all of us. But speculation by its very definition as a transitive verb is not the same as discussion.
  • 06-08-2010, 07:09 PM
    Kaorte
    Re: Terry Cullen raided
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by anthonym View Post
    The point was more so that by speculating we are starting to spread mis-information and non factual data which is never a good thing. I think the guy is a piece of crap at this point. But that's besides the point. Inversely, if thats how you feel about my post, you could have just ignored it as well. But like me, you chose not to, and to voice your opinion as well. :)

    I see nothing wrong with discussing the topic. It's very relevant to all of us. But speculation by its very definition as a transitive verb is not the same as discussion.

    Touche :D
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1