Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 742

0 members and 742 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,122
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

Look out PA residents!!

Printable View

  • 04-18-2017, 08:22 PM
    bcr229
    Bear in mind this is Waynesboro only, not the whole state of PA.

    And it stinks IMO.
  • 04-18-2017, 08:33 PM
    Oxylepy
    This proposal is already being noticed by a large number of pet owners across the nation. At the present time opposing the proposed section 62 titled "Keeping of animals" is the only way to avoid nation wide negative public relations.
  • 04-18-2017, 08:36 PM
    Oxylepy
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Oxylepy View Post
    This proposal is already being noticed by a large number of pet owners across the nation. At the present time opposing the proposed section 62 titled "Keeping of animals" is the only way to avoid nation wide negative public relations.

    My post from the other topic
  • 04-19-2017, 12:19 AM
    CALM Pythons
    Look out PA residents!!
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Sauzo View Post
    Wow so it looks like since the Lacey Act was more or less crushed, now individual states are posting their own rules it looks like.
    http://usark.org/campaign/action-ale...and-pet-limit/

    Thank God our Gov officials are going Full Bore and taking care of the real problems this country faces[emoji15][emoji848][emoji85][emoji86]
    Freaking Clowns


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 04-19-2017, 06:16 AM
    predatorkeeper87
    PA has always been weird with exotics. MOST places never care about snakes of any variety, but if you get caught with a sugar glider you are going to prison lol. It just blows my mind that no research is put into these legislations. What python is going to survive a PA winter? Hell a PA spring...blows my mind man.
  • 04-19-2017, 08:36 AM
    sneksNferts
    I personally wouldn't have suggested correcting their terminology. Go ahead and ban 30 round "clips", unicorns, and leprechauns while you're at it. I'll be over here changing my blinker fluid.
  • 04-19-2017, 09:14 AM
    predatorkeeper87
    Re: Look out PA residents!!
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sneksNferts View Post
    I personally wouldn't have suggested correcting their terminology. Go ahead and ban 30 round "clips", unicorns, and leprechauns while you're at it. I'll be over here changing my blinker fluid.

    100% off topic but every single time I see your name I think it says snacksandfarts.

    While you could make one hell of an argument in court with their wording, ultimately the court is going to decide against you regardless.
  • 04-19-2017, 09:49 AM
    sneksNferts
    Re: Look out PA residents!!
    Two of my other favorite things, and often related...


    I would think a good lawyer could argue this easily. If you're on the witness stand you better be very precise with what you say because if you say something poorly, they're going to use it against you and they're not gonna take "Well da-gum, you know what I meant" for an answer.
    Why is it ok if the state says it?

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
  • 04-19-2017, 10:01 AM
    JodanOrNoDan
    Re: Look out PA residents!!
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sneksNferts View Post
    Two of my other favorite things, and often related...


    I would think a good lawyer could argue this easily. If you're on the witness stand you better be very precise with what you say because if you say something poorly, they're going to use it against you and they're not gonna take "Well da-gum, you know what I meant" for an answer.
    Why is it ok if the state says it?

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

    No such thing as a good lawyer.
  • 04-19-2017, 10:02 AM
    predatorkeeper87
    Re: Look out PA residents!!
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by sneksNferts View Post
    Two of my other favorite things, and often related...


    I would think a good lawyer could argue this easily. If you're on the witness stand you better be very precise with what you say because if you say something poorly, they're going to use it against you and they're not gonna take "Well da-gum, you know what I meant" for an answer.
    Why is it ok if the state says it?

    Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

    If the word "exotics" is used in reference to the animals it won't matter if they screw up constrictor/restricting. They will say we mean all exotic snakes etc etc etc.

    I don't know the semantics of it all really but I can tell you I watched a state policeman do something very similar in a DUI case against a friend of mine. He didn't remember half of what happened, more or less made up stuff to fill in the blanks and said a lot of "ums, and maybes" right to the judge lol, friend still caught the charge even though he couldn't recount the scene from less than a week before, and I was on scene as well as in the court room sitting there saying in my head "nope, not what happened, nope that wasn't there" etc haha.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1