Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 830

1 members and 829 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,101
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
  • 10-17-2011, 09:38 PM
    satomi325
    I use the hydrofarm and really like it. It works great for me and is a good t-stat if you're on a budget. But I hope to upgrade someday when I get better funding and more snakes.

    Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
  • 10-17-2011, 09:41 PM
    Yaqcubper
    Quote:

    Hydrofarms seem to be a ok unit I have been testing one (really testing it) and have as of yet been able to force it to fail. It as noted is not an accurate unit it cannot be trusted to read temps correctly. The three I have been paid to test read high. What is says the temp is, is wrong. I would not suggest to trust it that way. It also has a longer 'throw' than I'd like myself it seems to be about 5º in total hi to low. That is quite a long way. Glass tanks however don't give up heat quickly and in a fairly warm room will likely work well tubs on the other hand heat very quickly and cool very quickly, so I'd suggest hydrofarms with a single tub set up (direct heat) in a cool room (less than 77ºF) to be a poor choice. Before anyone jumps on me for that make sure you have read my post carefully. I am tired of explaining direct heat and indirect heat warm and cool rooms are not the same.
    Okay so, just to make sure I understand correctly...I get that the thermostat I mentioned is not the most accurate but do you mean that it's OK to use on a TANK and NOT a TUB or OK to use on a TUB and not a Glass TANK?
  • 10-17-2011, 09:45 PM
    Yaqcubper
    Quote:

    I use the hydrofarm and really like it. It works great for me and is a good t-stat if you're on a budget. But I hope to upgrade someday when I get better funding and more snakes.
    I want to upgrade too one day to some of the other more high quality looking ones but right now I don't have any stat at all and not enough money to put down over 100 dollars for one so I was hoping this one would be ok for now.
  • 10-17-2011, 10:34 PM
    kitedemon
    I'd feel ok using it on a tank. The problem is this if you set it for 90ºF (leaving the messing about you have to do to correct the probe inaccuracy) the unit will heat until it hit 92 or so and then shut down until it reaches 87 or so then kick back on again. Follow me? Glass hold heat a long time it cools at quite a slow rate once it is warm the probe of the hydrofarm is heavy but will still cool faster than the glass will. The unit kicks back in before the glass cools too much reducing the range of the 'swing hi to low' the test I set up in a warm space (78ºF) only swung 2ºF so it went 1 1/2º below the set point and 1/2º over it. Tubs heat and cool faster than the probe. So the tubs temps dropped lower than the probes by 2ºF and higher than the probe by yet another 1º So every cycle saw temps range from 85-93 than back. That is quite a range cycle through every few min.

    I don't really recommend it as I feel that the degree of swing is a bit much and that temp control is harder to achieve but it can be made to work with a tank without messing with it much.
  • 10-17-2011, 11:55 PM
    Maddumpling
    Re: Is this a Good Thermostat to use?
    I use the hydrofarm with my rack its pretty good. I dont care what others say about it and the quality of the thermostat and the price. The Hydrofarm is used for gardens but has the same functions as other thermostats. It doesnt get above 98 or something which is good, less risks of burning and what not and its affordable. Not everyone can afford the fancy 100 dollar thermostats or the 56 dollar thermostats. It does fluctuate a bit but not that much for me. I have my rack set up with the hydrofarm and all them are eating well and looking healthy.
  • 10-18-2011, 12:36 AM
    pythonregius24
    Thermostat:
    http://www.bigappleherp.com/BAH-1000-Thermostat

    Thermometer:
    http://www.bigappleherp.com/Big-Appl...umidity-Gauges
    Get the 24 dollar one.

    These really work great for me.
  • 10-18-2011, 08:56 AM
    Strick
    Re: Is this a Good Thermostat to use?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Yaqcubper View Post
    Okay so, just to make sure I understand correctly...I get that the thermostat I mentioned is not the most accurate but do you mean that it's OK to use on a TANK and NOT a TUB or OK to use on a TUB and not a Glass TANK?

    It's a good thermostat for what you want ot use it for. You can use it on tank or tub. I am running 3 of them now and they are within the +/- 2 degrees as advertised. You will have to find your set point depending on your setup.

    It does not matter if one is using a $150 or a $30 thermostat there should be a backup system of some sort. Electronics no matter the cost can fail.
  • 10-18-2011, 10:44 AM
    kitedemon
    Re: Is this a Good Thermostat to use?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Maddumpling View Post
    I use the hydrofarm with my rack its pretty good. I dont care what others say about it and the quality of the thermostat and the price. The Hydrofarm is used for gardens but has the same functions as other thermostats. It doesnt get above 98 or something which is good, less risks of burning and what not and its affordable. Not everyone can afford the fancy 100 dollar thermostats or the 56 dollar thermostats. It does fluctuate a bit but not that much for me. I have my rack set up with the hydrofarm and all them are eating well and looking healthy.

    Indirect heat vs direct heat are completely different. Unless you have glued heat sources on each tub it is simply not the same. Part of the problem is that a rack in a controlled room has next to nothing to do with a tank in a regular room. A t-stat that is problematic in direct heat in cool conditions likely will not be under regular snake room conditions. It is like saying my car is an off road vehicle because it handles the gravel on my driveway.

    Hydrofarms work well under some conditions and not so well under others. Ranco and johnsons and slightly better under conditions that make hydrofarms screwy as their probe accuracy is better and they have a one degree up down swing rather than the 5º the hydrofarms have. Just to note mine is the 'new' design not the old design it is mark new and improved accuracy. When they changed it and what the old one was like I have no idea.

    26.9ºC = 80.42ºF this is a platinum LTD thermometer that is calibrated once a year and is accurate to 0.1ºC and is reading correctly.

    http://images15.fotki.com/v230/photo...CA_9509-vi.jpgHosted on Fotki
  • 10-18-2011, 10:55 AM
    kitedemon
    Re: Is this a Good Thermostat to use?
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Strick View Post
    It's a good thermostat for what you want ot use it for. You can use it on tank or tub. I am running 3 of them now and they are within the +/- 2 degrees as advertised. You will have to find your set point depending on your setup.

    It does not matter if one is using a $150 or a $30 thermostat there should be a backup system of some sort. Electronics no matter the cost can fail.

    A fail safe t-stat IMO is not an optional it should be part of a standard set up. Probes get pulled off, things fail ___ happens, Fact of life. There are too many threads speaking of over heating from one thing or another. I have had a t-stat fail and have seen heat tape get so hot it burned a hole in a tub and rack. Failsafes will stop most failures from becoming a problem. Hydrofarms make great fail safes as they have high wattage ratings and the probe inaccuracy is not super critical in a fail safe. Mine is set to 100 (new version hydrofarm). I'd rather see two hydrofarms than one herpstat.

    http://images9.fotki.com/v114/photos...drawing-vi.jpgHosted on Fotki
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1