Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 669

0 members and 669 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud

Mississippi H1293

Printable View

  • 02-02-2010, 09:55 PM
    kc261
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Freakie_frog View Post
    Things like the cane toad, or if fed the right diet dart frog there are even newts in CA that are toxic. It's simply put in the to cover their bases..

    Yeah, but those are amphibians, not reptiles. Are there poisonous reptiles?
  • 02-02-2010, 09:59 PM
    Freakie_frog
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kc261 View Post
    Yeah, but those are amphibians, not reptiles. Are there poisonous reptiles?

    Good point!!
  • 02-03-2010, 10:14 AM
    snakemastercanada
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Freakie_frog View Post
    Just so every one is aware the law is for "Reptiles". There "poisonous" reptiles so the language is correct..

    Another thing to look at with this language is that depending what literature they are using and how old, all snakes are considered constrictors there is also the true constrictors which is what we all know. Broad based language covers just a little too much and can be used for a wide interpretation.
  • 02-03-2010, 10:18 AM
    Freakie_frog
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by snakemastercanada View Post
    Another thing to look at with this language is that depending what literature they are using and how old, all snakes are considered constrictors there is also the true constrictors which is what we all know. Broad based language covers just a little too much and can be used for a wide interpretation.

    Exactly which is why I plan to meet with my local State government and see exactly what they plan and what exactly they are trying to achieve..because we all know there are only two ways a snake kills its prey..Venom and constriction.
  • 02-03-2010, 01:13 PM
    Louis Kirkland
    Re: Mississippi H1293
  • 02-03-2010, 10:45 PM
    kc261
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Louis Kirkland View Post

    For those who'd rather skip the trip, or perhaps can't view it, it says the bill died in committee! Woohoo!!!!! That's one victory for our side!

    I think we should be on the lookout though... in case it just died because it was too broad or something, and a new, "improved" version shows up soon.
  • 02-03-2010, 10:57 PM
    Freakie_frog
    Re: Mississippi H1293
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by kc261 View Post
    For those who'd rather skip the trip, or perhaps can't view it, it says the bill died in committee! Woohoo!!!!! That's one victory for our side!

    I think we should be on the lookout though... in case it just died because it was too broad or something, and a new, "improved" version shows up soon.

    The word I got from a staffer was that the MS Dept of Wildlife didn't feel that there was enough threat to warrant the bill..
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1