Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 540

1 members and 539 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
  • 11-06-2008, 11:22 AM
    asplundii
    Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    How exactly are breeders using the term "incompatible" in reference to specific lines? As a geneticist I know of two uses for it.

    So, in terms of ball morphs just to keep it simple I will use the VPI axanthic and Jolliff axanthic lines.

    Both are phenotypic axanthic

    So, if I cross a VPI to a Jolliff do I get:

    1) A bunch of normal looking offspring (that are in essence double het for both VPI and Jolliff.)? In this case incompatible would mean that the two lines are likely distinct genetic loci so even though there are 2 copies of an axanthic-type gene in each of the offspring the offspring are normal appearing because the 2 axanthic-type genes are are at different locations and therefore each is complimented by the normal WT copy at the same location.

    2) No viable offspring? In this case incompatible would quite literally mean the 2 different mutations are not compatible when present in the same animal as single copies leading to the death of the offspring
  • 11-06-2008, 11:24 AM
    casperca
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    I'm pretty sure it is used in terms of #1.
  • 11-06-2008, 11:48 AM
    jkobylka
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    There are no ball pythons traits that when combined have been proven an always fatal combination... to my knowledge.

    The answer is #1

    Justin
  • 11-06-2008, 12:07 PM
    jere000
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jkobylka View Post
    There are no ball pythons traits that when combined have been proven an always fatal combination... to my knowledge.

    The answer is #1

    Justin

    actually theres a combination with woma thats always fatal i forget the name tho
  • 11-06-2008, 12:23 PM
    Freakie_frog
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by jere000 View Post
    actually theres a combination with woma thats always fatal i forget the name tho

    I think you may be thinking of the Pearl. But its the Homozygous from of the woma and not a combo.
  • 11-06-2008, 03:31 PM
    asplundii
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    Thank you all. I suspected #1 to be the case but I had not heard anything explicit on the matter and was just curious.

    So, tangent, has anyone ever tried for a double homozygous VPI/Jolliff (or VPI/TSK or Jolliff/TSK)? I'd think maybe a double axanthic might hold its colour better over time...
  • 11-06-2008, 03:42 PM
    muddoc
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by asplundii View Post
    Thank you all. I suspected #1 to be the case but I had not heard anything explicit on the matter and was just curious.

    So, tangent, has anyone ever tried for a double homozygous VPI/Jolliff (or VPI/TSK or Jolliff/TSK)? I'd think maybe a double axanthic might hold its colour better over time...

    Mike Jolliff (originator of the Jolliff line Axanthic) did breed VPI line to Jolliff line years ago, and proved the incompatibility. However, I do not know if Mikie ever tried to produce the Homozygous combination). I do not know of anyone that has bred DH x DH, to see the outcome of the Double Homozygous animal.

    I hope that helps,
  • 11-07-2008, 09:58 AM
    asplundii
    Re: Question on the use of the term "incompatible"
    Hey Tim,

    Thanks for the info. Not a huge deal to me if it has happened or not, was just a moment of curiosity.

    Cheers
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1