» Site Navigation
4 members and 3,274 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,124
Threads: 248,566
Posts: 2,568,933
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Rai
|
-
Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Press Release From The Department of the Interior Today.
http://www.doi.gov/news/pressrelease...20_release.cfm
This essentially means that the USGS report will get a real review and that we can tell our Senators and Representatives that instead of supporting HR2881 & S373 they should let the Department of the Interior do the job that they are supposed to do.
The regulatory process will work in our favor and there are all kinds of exceptions that could be made by DOI to allow the captive bred trade in these animals to continue.
Please cross post!
-adam
Click Below to Fight The National Python & Boa Ban
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
- Anna Sewell, author of Black Beauty
-
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Adam_Wysocki For This Useful Post:
BPelizabeth (01-21-2010),cinderbird (01-20-2010),Emilio (01-20-2010),Jyson (01-21-2010),Louis Kirkland (01-20-2010),monk90222 (01-20-2010),Russ Lawson (01-20-2010),Snakeman (01-21-2010),spk329 (01-21-2010),waltah! (01-20-2010)
-
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
-
-
Registered User
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Press Release
Salazar Moves to Ban Importation and Interstate Transfer of Burmese Python and Eight Other Giant Invasive Snakes
FWS to Propose Injurious Species Listing under Lacey Act
01/20/2010
Contact: Vanessa Kauffman (FWS) (703) 358-2138
Kendra Barkoff (DOI) (202) 713-0827
NEW YORK, NY – Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today announced the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will propose to list the Burmese python and eight other large constrictor snakes that threaten the Everglades and other sensitive ecosystems as “injurious wildlife” under the Lacey Act.
Salazar made the announcement at the Port of New York, which serves as the largest point of entry in the nation for imports of wildlife and wildlife products. Last year, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Inspectors at John F. Kennedy International Airport handled more than 27, 000 separate wildlife shipments valued at more than $1 billion, or 16 percent of all U.S. wildlife imports.
The proposal, which will be open to public comment before Salazar makes a final decision, would prohibit importation and interstate transportation of the animals.
“The Burmese python and these other alien snakes are destroying some of our nation’s most treasured – and most fragile – ecosystems,” Salazar said. “The Interior Department and states such as Florida are taking swift and common sense action to control and eliminate the populations of these snakes, but it is an uphill battle in ecosystems where they have no natural predators. If we are going to succeed, we must shut down the importation of the snakes and end the interstate commerce and transportation of them.”
In total, wildlife inspectors stationed at ports across the nation processed more than 169,700 shipments of wildlife and wildlife products last year with an estimated value of $2.7 billion.
“Our wildlife inspectors are the front line of defense for the nation, combating illegal wildlife trafficking and preventing the importation of countless species of illegal injurious wildlife. This proposal will give them an additional tool to restrict imports that are causing significant ecological and economic damage, while giving our law enforcement agents the ability to restrict the spread of these species within our borders,” said U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Sam Hamilton.
The nine species proposed for listing are: the Burmese python, northern African python, southern African python, reticulated python, green anaconda, yellow anaconda, Beni or Bolivian anaconda, DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and boa constrictor.
Many of these large snakes are popular as pets, and are associated with a large domestic and international trade. Over the past 30 years, about a million individuals of these nine species have been imported into the United States, and current domestic production of some species likely exceeds import levels.
Under the Lacey Act, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to regulate the importation and interstate transport of species determined to be injurious to humans, the interests of agriculture, horticulture or forestry, and the welfare and survival of wildlife resources of the United States.
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-FL and Rep. Kendrick Meek, D-FL, have introduced legislation in Congress, supported by Secretary Salazar and the Obama Administration, which would also restrict importation and interstate sale and transportation of the nine species of constrictor snakes. Today’s proposal ensures that the injurious proposal will be considered through all available legislative and administrative avenues.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will publish the proposed rule in the Federal Register in early February. At that time, the Service will also make a draft economic analysis and draft environmental analysis available to the public. The public will then have 60 days to comment on the proposal.
The Burmese python is currently distributed across many thousands of square miles in south Florida and a population of boa constrictors is established south of Miami. In addition, recent evidence strongly suggests a reproducing population of northern African pythons on the western boundaries of Miami.
The U.S. Geological Survey issued a risk assessment last October that highlighted the threat. Of the nine large constrictors assessed, five were shown to pose a high risk to the health of the ecosystem, including the Burmese python, northern African python, southern African python, yellow anaconda, and boa constrictor. The remaining four large constrictors—the reticulated python, green anaconda, Beni or Bolivian anaconda, and DeSchauensee’s anaconda—were shown to pose a medium risk.
Burmese pythons and other large constrictor snakes are highly adaptable to new environments
And are opportunistic in expanding their geographic range. More than 1,200 of the snakes have been removed from Everglades National Park since 2000, with others having been removed from the Florida Keys, along Florida’s west coast, and farther north along the Florida peninsula. Burmese pythons threaten many imperiled species and other wildlife. Two Burmese pythons were found near Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge, and the remains of three endangered Key Largo wood rats were found in their stomachs.
Salazar strongly encouraged pet owners not to release snakes or any other pets into the wild.
“People may think that this is a convenient and humane way to be rid of unwanted animals, but as in the case of pythons and other constrictors, it can lead to devastating consequences for local wildlife populations and the ecosystems they depend on,” Salazar said.
Salazar said he has directed the Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct a comprehensive review of existing legal and regulatory authorities to address the invasive species issue on a broader scale.
“I’ve asked the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to make recommendations regarding the potential tools we need to address the invasive species challenge – both to combat existing invasive species problems and act more effectively to prevent the introduction of new invasive threats into our country,” said Salazar.
Last edited by snakemastercanada; 01-20-2010 at 08:39 PM.
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Ok... Sooo even though we now have more support from legislators who really really want to pass this bill, we will have another 60 days to voice our opinion and pray that they actually listen?? Since now it has been made apparent that these snake MUST be controlled by every possible means. But hang on a minute.. They are going to take into consideration the economy which none of them care about so I can totally see this as great news.
Ok I see now.
-----> My brain--->
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by Foschi Exotic Serpents
It's good news because this action will hopefully take the decision to ban these animals out of the hands of the politicians where there is no procedure for public comment, scientific debate, rebuttal of risk assessment, analysis of economic impacts, or any of the other rules required by the official listing process and gives the United States Fish and Wildlife service the authority to follow the regulatory process.
The regulatory process in place for lacey act listing will give stakeholders an opportunity for serious discussion and scientific debate as well as the ability to offer alternatives to an outright ban.
To put it simply, Politicians deciding our future is bad ... USFWS conducting a process designed to equally consider all factors and incorporate external input is good.
Hope this helps.
-adam
Click Below to Fight The National Python & Boa Ban
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing."
- Anna Sewell, author of Black Beauty
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Originally Posted by Adam_Wysocki
It's good news because this action will hopefully take the decision to ban these animals out of the hands of the politicians where there is no procedure for public comment, scientific debate, rebuttal of risk assessment, analysis of economic impacts, or any of the other rules required by the official listing process and gives the United States Fish and Wildlife service the authority to follow the regulatory process.
The regulatory process in place for lacey act listing will give stakeholders an opportunity for serious discussion and scientific debate as well as the ability to offer alternatives to an outright ban.
To put it simply, Politicians deciding our future is bad ... USFWS conducting a process designed to equally consider all factors and incorporate external input is good.
Hope this helps.
-adam
We can only hope for the best I suppose
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
Adam,
I have to agree with the posts here. I did not see this as a favorable press release. What I got from this is that because the US F&W endorse this movement, it has gained strength.
I hope you are right that claims will be further evaluated, but so far it has not seemed not make a dent in the issue that it will mean economic devastation for many of us.
"60 days for the public to respond"....warm up your fingers folks. Write and type this proposal a new one.
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
What it means is the scientists get to chime in on this very unscientific report thus proving that it is not worth the paper it is written on.
They are gathering info that will be relevant from credible sources, not biased like the stupid USGS report
-
-
Re: Good News Regarding S373/HR2811
I agree this news is more on the good end of the scale than the bad. It at least gives a chance for proper scientific input as well as the consideration of economic data.
The passing of S373/HR2811 would have totally bypassed that.
Another good factor here is that even if "the worst" happens and these 9 species are included in the Lacey act this way instead of through the passage of S373/HR2811, at least it doesn't set the precedent that it is ok to bypass the proper process.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|