Re: Adding "one more morph": A bright future for the BP industry
Originally Posted by dr del
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't your example the only one in which you wouldn't need to prove it out by breeding?
Super pastel x super pastel = all super pastels.
dr del
Dr Del,
Yes you are correct, this is what I tried to convey with the "or" in my above post. You could hold your animals back and prove them by breeding OR arrange your breedings so that all outcomes are known/easily identifiable.
Re: Adding "one more morph": A bright future for the BP industry
Hi,
Originally Posted by nevohraalnavnoj
Dr Del,
Yes you are correct, this is what I tried to convey with the "or" in my above post. You could hold your animals back and prove them by breeding OR arrange your breedings so that all outcomes are known/easily identifiable.
Sorry if my post was confusing.
JonV
No, your post was fine - I'm just an idiot.
dr del
Last edited by dr del; 02-23-2009 at 02:13 PM.
Reason: adding quote for clarity
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.