Exactly
Perhaps IF he has turned a new leaf in life would be a better way of phrasing it. As far as i know, and i may be very wrong, the only apology he's made about slaughtering and torturing animals is that circus style press-coference in which he read a letter that contained the words "im sorry." I'm not sure if that qualifies as "turning over a new leaf in life" in my opinion. But that's why we're talking about it.
"Let's assume he will leave federal prison rehabilitated in every way."
I graduated a couple years ago with a Criminal Justice Administration degree....definitely a "BS" degree in many ways (bachelor of science...and).
Anyhow, I can tell you that I had several professors, and several text books flat out stating that the current goal of our prison systems has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH REHABILITATION. I believe there's evidence to support just the opposite as a matter of fact, people come out even worse than when they went in!
All im trying to say is that this quote - the first sentence in the paragraph of assumptions - is asking us to "suspend all disbelieve" and swallow a huge assumption in order to follow the rest of the author's logic about how Vick should be re-instated in the NFL.
I agree that he was pretty good a few years ago. However, in my opion, he wasn't such a great FOOTBALL PLAYER that the fact that he's a dispicable human being should be overlooked.
Just my thoughts on the matter.![]()