Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,402

2 members and 1,400 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,937
Threads: 249,130
Posts: 2,572,295
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeorgiaD182
Results 1 to 10 of 108

Thread: Sulfur = Fire

Threaded View

  1. #22
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    04-03-2007
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 303 Times in 187 Posts

    Re: Sulfur = Fire

    I think Randy's post pretty much summed it up.

    I was wondering if you had any pics of the big female Eric, I know you had her for awhile, and liked her She looks good in your pic, but not as Burgundy as she does in some pics. Could be a lighting thing, but your pic is pretty darn representitive of how she looks.

    I agree, there is no way to please everyone. I did what I felt was right at the time, and have no regrets. I think some of you have gotten way too wound up and upset about it, for pretty petty reasons. I think the "confusion" arguement is old and tired. If you are trying to say that someone will buy a Sulfur and not know what they are buying, I doubt it. If you think anyone will sell a Sulfur and knowingly mislead someone as to what they are selling, and what someone is buying, I think you have misjudged our character.

    Also, whoever said EBN has had Sulfurs "forever" is totally adding to the misinformation....EBN got 1.1 Sulfur Pastels and 0.1 Sulfurs FROM ME in 2006.
    So, unless they got some animals from Eric, and I do not think they did, I would say 2006 to 2008 is far from "forever." The ORIGINAL breeding was done in 2005...so there are no Sulfurs older than 2005 except for my original female.

    Thanks for all the interest, you know what they say about publicity....

    Eric is right in his comment about not using the name Fire. I was told that Davies was making a big deal about the name, and that anyone using the name Fire to describe any snake other than a snake from his original line,would get sued...etc. Not that I was really worried, but that and a few other tidbits of information I got, made me go another direction.

    Dave

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to EmberBall For This Useful Post:

    ANCPYTHONS (10-22-2008),MarkS (10-22-2008),MPenn (10-22-2008),Wh00h0069 (10-22-2008)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1