Originally Posted by PythonWallace
Are you saying you'd rather take a bite from a 6' afrock than a 6' chondo?Pound for pound, inch for inch or however you put it, afrocks and burms have larger teeth than chondros. Look at the pictures and imagine that the head sizes are the same. The afrock's teeth are way bigger. But being that chondros don't get that big, teeth on larger boids make chondro teeth look miniscule.
I think we are way off topic here, so that's all I have to say about it.
thats not really what im saying at all...
but a six foot chondro would be an exceptionally large full grown specimen where as a six foot afrock would still not be fully grown so if i had to pick i would rather get bit by a six foot, couple thousand gram animal rather than getting bit by a 20 foot couple hundred pound animal or in this case the the not fully grown six foot tens of pounds animal.
i agree with you that these other boids have teeth that make a chondros look miniscule but a t-rex's teeth must make a retic's teeth look like sowing pins.
look, youre right, so is everyone else and we are waay off topic here. i think we are all saying the same thing in different ways.
Reply With Quote