For the record I am aware that there is a difference between the siper issue and human parkinsons disease, I made the comparison to help make my point. Nobody would intentionally try to make a child with parkinsons, why is it acceptable or even desirable to produce similar results in ball pythons?

On the Caramels, there is a second type of caramel that does not kink. This second line was actually the very first caramel lineage to be imported, and the line pre-dates almost every other ball morph. This lineage nearly was lost but they are now being produced in very small numbers. This line is acutally a little nicer looking on average and is NOT compatable with all the other caramel lines. So you can work with caramels at some point in the future without dealing with the kinking issue.

Nick