Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 671

0 members and 671 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,903
Threads: 249,098
Posts: 2,572,070
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, wkeith67
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Threaded View

  1. #7
    BPnet Veteran Seneschal's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-21-2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    270
    Thanked 130 Times in 89 Posts
    Images: 4

    Thumbs up Re: Genetics question -

    No, if it were dominant and the parent carrier was heterozygous spider (visible spider) bred to a normal then the spider parent would only contribute one allele, not necessarily the one necessary for a spider morph.

    ---S---N
    N| SN NN
    N| SN NN

    so, 50% spider, %50 normal.

    ---S---N
    S| SS SN
    N| SN NN
    50% heterozygous (but still visible spider), 25% normal, and 25% homozygous spider--theoretically identical to the het spiders, so you wouldn't be able to tell unless you bred it to a normal.

    ---S---S
    N| SN SN
    N| SN SN

    so the homo spider bred to a normal would make all spiders, thus theoretically proving the spider a dominant gene and proving that particular spider parent to be homozygous for the trait.
    Last edited by Seneschal; 09-12-2007 at 07:45 PM. Reason: making the punnett squares better
    Ball Pythons
    1.0 Normal "Draccy"
    0.2 Normal "Matika", "Lara Croft"
    1.0 Lesser Cinny "Thor"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1